Financial Markets EnterprisePLUS [E+] - User contributions [en]

:Innovation Management

2015-09-09T11:08:48Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Innovation Management}}
[[Category:Plans]]

:Transformation Management

2015-09-09T11:08:34Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Transformation Management}}
[[Category:Plans]]

:Governance Management

2015-09-09T11:08:20Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Governance Management}}
[[Category:Plans]]

:Lifecycle Management

2015-09-09T11:08:07Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Lifecycle Management}}
[[Category:Plans]]

:Project Management

2015-09-09T11:07:47Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Project Management}}
[[Category:Plans]]

:Portfolio & Program Management

2015-09-09T11:07:25Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Portfolio & Program Management}}
[[Category:Plans]]

:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards

2015-09-09T11:06:12Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards}}
The Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards are the result of international industry experts and academic consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its various enterprise transformation activities.

Today, 72% of all IT projects fail to deliver on time, on budget and on value*. This represents economic and productivity losses of $3 trillion (4.7 % of global GDP) due to the lack of understanding of 1) the difference between transformation and innovation and 2) don't know where to start.**

<blockquote>
''We realize that organizations apply various transformation and innovation methods and approaches e.g. Change Management, LEAN, TQM, Zero Defect and Business Transformation & Innovation Enablement (BITE), etc. Therefore, we have ensured that all of our published Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Working, Modelling, Implementation and Governance.''
</blockquote>

To ensure full integration with other methods and approaches within an organization, the enterprise transformation and innovation standards have an ontology and semantic concept built in that allows for the meta objects to be reused in the other enterprise standards as well as the industry standards.

This includes applying the various standards used within transformation:
*'''Management Principles''' - to define the purpose and goals as well as to administer, govern and control the IT initiatives.
*'''Engineering Principles''' - how and where it can or needs to be decomposed and composed together.
*'''Modelling Principles''' - which design concepts can or should be applied.
*'''Architecture Principles''' - which architecture rules apply and which artifacts and templates (e.g. maps, matrices and models) could or should be applied.
*'''Information & Technology''' - that enables the automation and optimization of the organization.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture-01.png|frame|center|900px|link=http://{{SERVERNAME}}/images/b/b7/LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture.pdf|Enterprise Engineering, Enterprise Modelling & Enterprise Architecture]]

Creating the ability to ''' "Align, Compare & Unify" ''' different enterprise standards together as well as combine them with the industry standards (or vice versa) in combining the relevant aspect e.g. meta objects.

Developing a whole new concept of agile integration and standardization in the following 12 enterprise transformation disciplines and areas:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''E TRANSFORMATION & INNOVATION STANDARDS'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''LEAD-ES60ETI'''
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Alignment_%26_Unity_Reference_Content|Alignment & Unity Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60001AL
|-
|[[#|Change Management Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60002AL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Maturity_Reference_Content|Maturity Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60003AL
|-
|[[#|Continuous Improvement Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60004AL
|-
|[[#|Organizational Development Reference Content ]]
|LEAD-ES60005AL
|-
|[[#|Optimization Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60006AL
|-
|[[#|Effectiveness Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60007AL
|-
|[[#|Efficiency Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60008AL
|-
|[[#|Re-engineering Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60009AL
|-
|[[#|Root Cause Analysis Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60010AL
|-
|[[#|Transformation Benchmarking Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60011AL
|-
|[[#|Innovation Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60012AL
|-
|[[#|Alignment of Portfolio & Program & Project (PPP) Management]]
|LEAD-ES60013AL
|-
|}

<blockquote>
''Please note that the Enterprise Transformation Standards are only open for the LEADing Practice community members, however, some material has been made publicly available for review purposes.''
</blockquote>

Our community consist of organizations applying our LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards e.g. practitioners, software vendors and academics. Being a community-driven open architecture and open standard access to all assets, templates, tools and artifacts is free for certified practitioners, thereby ensuring that modelling principles are applied correctly.

While it is free to join the community and no cost apply to the use of any community assets, the quality of the participating practitioners must be guaranteed, by being LEAD certified in the specific field of where they work. For organizations interested in applying LEADing Practices, we recommend contacting us and highlighting the objective and key challenges, whereafter a practitioner will be assigned to support you.

(*) McKinsey Oxford study 2012, Delivering IT projects on time, on budget and on value, representing economic and productivity losses of $3 trillion (4.7 % of global GDP) as 45% of budget run over budget, 7% are behind schedule and 56% deliver less functionality than predicted. Achieving at least $15 million in benefits, requires spending of $59 million.

(**) Leading Practice Transformation & Innovation Research, 2011/2012. Scope: 1765 CEO´s and 2936 business leaders representing all major countries and industries.

:Enterprise Information & Technology Standards

2015-09-09T11:05:02Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Enterprise Information & Technology Standards }}
The Enterprise Information & Technology Standards are the result of international industry experts and academic consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its various enterprise information & technology activities.

<blockquote>
''We realize that organizations apply various information & technology methods and approaches such as ITIL, COBIT, ASAP and Oracle AIM, etc. Therefore, we have ensured that all of our published Enterprise Information & Technology Standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Working, Modelling, Implementation and Governance.''
</blockquote>

To ensure full integration with other methods and approaches within an organization, the enterprise information & technology standards have an ontology and semantic concept built in that allows for the meta objects to be reused in the other enterprise standards as well as the industry standards.

This includes applying the various standards used within information & technology:
*'''Management Principles''' - to define the purpose and goals as well as to administer, govern and control the IT initiatives.
*'''Engineering Principles''' - how and where it can or needs to be decomposed and composed together.
*'''Modelling Principles''' - which design concepts can or should be applied.
*'''Architecture Principles''' - which architecture rules apply and which artifacts and templates (e.g. maps, matrices and models) could or should be applied.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture-01.png|frame|center|900px|link=http://{{SERVERNAME}}/images/b/b7/LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture.pdf|Enterprise Engineering, Enterprise Modelling & Enterprise Architecture]]

Creating the ability to '''"Align, Compare & Unify"''' different enterprise standards together as well as combine them with the industry standards (or vice versa) in combining the relevant aspect e.g. meta objects.

Developing a whole new concept of agile integration and standardization in the following 23 enterprise information & technology disciplines and areas:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''ENTERPRISE INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''LEAD-ES50EIT'''
|-
|[[#|IT Strategy Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50001PG
|-
|[[#|Business Model of IT Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50002BC
|-
|[[#|IT Process Map Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50003BP
|-
|[[#|IT Center of Competency Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50004BC
|-
|[[#|Cloud Computing Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50005CC
|-
|[[#|Cyber Security Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50007CS
|-
|[[#|Knowledge Management Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50008PGIDBC
|-
|[[#|Analytic Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50009PGIDBC
|-
|[[#|Reporting Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50010PGIDBC
|-
|[[#|Application Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50011SAIDBCBP
|-
|[[#|Application Modernization & Optimization Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50012SAIDBCBP
|-
|[[#|ERP Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50013SADIBC
|-
|[[#|Software Testing Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50014SADI
|-
|[[#|Information Management Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50015BCIDSA
|-
|[[#|Data Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50016DISABC
|-
|[[#|Rule Modelling Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50017PGBCSADI
|-
|[[#|Service-Oriented Computing Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50018ES
|-
|[[#|Platform Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50019PLES
|-
|[[#|Infrastructure Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50020IL
|-
|[[#|Social Media Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50021AL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Blueprinting_Reference_Content|Blueprinting Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50022AL
|-
|[[#|Implementation Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50023AL
|-
|[[#|Cloud Ontology Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50024ALL
|-
|}

<blockquote>
''Please note that the Enterprise Information & Technology Standards are only open for the LEADing Practice community members, however, some material has been made publicly available for review purposes.''
</blockquote>

Our community consist of organizations applying our LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards e.g. practitioners, software vendors and academics. Being a community-driven open architecture and open standard access to all assets, templates, tools and artifacts is free for certified practitioners, thereby ensuring that modelling principles are applied correctly.

While it is free to join the community and no cost apply to the use of any community assets, the quality of the participating practitioners must be guaranteed, by being LEAD certified in the specific field of where they work. For organizations interested in applying LEADing Practices, we recommend contacting us and highlighting the objective and key challenges, whereafter a practitioner will be assigned to support you.

:Enterprise Architecture Standards

2015-09-09T11:00:07Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Enterprise Architecture Standards}}
The Enterprise Architecture Standards are the result of international industry experts and academic consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its various enterprise engineering activities.

<blockquote>
''We realize that organizations apply various architecture methods and approaches e.g. TOGAF, META, FEAF, etc. as well as various disciplines, such as Business Architecture, Information Architecture and Data Architecture, etc. Therefore, we have ensured that all of our published Enterprise Architecture Standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Working, Modelling, Implementation and Governance.''
</blockquote>

To ensure full integration with other methods and approaches within an organization, the enterprise architecture standards have an ontology and semantic concept built in that allows for the meta objects to be reused in the other enterprise standards as well as the industry standards.

This includes applying the various standards:
*Engineering Principles - how and where it can or needs to be decomposed and composed together.
*Modelling Principles - which design concepts can or should be applied.
*Architecture Principles - which architecture rules apply and which artifacts and templates (e.g. maps, matrices and models) could or should be applied.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture-01.png|frame|center|900px|link=http://lead.orpheus-dev.com/images/b/b7/LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture.pdf|Enterprise Engineering, Enterprise Modelling & Enterprise Architecture]]

Creating the ability to "Align, Compare & Unify" different enterprise standards together as well as combine them with the industry standards (or vice versa) in combining the relevant aspect e.g. meta objects.

Developing a whole new concept of agile integration and standardization in the following 13 enterprise architecture disciplines and areas:
{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;border:0px;" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;" |
'''ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS'''
|style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 30%;text-align:left;" |
'''LEAD-ES40EAS'''
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Layered_Enterprise_Architecture_Reference_Content|Layered Enterprise Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40001AL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Business_Architecture_Reference_Content|Business Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40002PGBCPSI
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Value_Architecture_Reference_Content|Value Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40003PG
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Process_Architecture_Reference_Content|Process Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40004BP
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Service-Oriented_Architecture_Reference_Content|Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40005BS
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Application_Architecture_Reference_Content|Application Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40006SAID
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Information_Architecture_Reference_Content|Information Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40007BCSAD
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Data_Architecture_Reference_Content|Data Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40008SAI
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Platform_Architecture_Reference_Content|Platform Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40009PL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Infrastructure_Architecture_Reference_Content|Infrastructure Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40010IL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:EA_Governance_Reference_Content|EA Governance Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40011GO
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Security_Architecture_Reference_Content|Security Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40012CS
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Cloud_Architecture_Reference_Content|Cloud Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES40013CC
|}
 

<blockquote>
''Please note that the Enterprise Architecture Standards are only open for the LEADing Practice community members, however, some material has been made publicly available for review purposes.''
</blockquote>

Our community consist of organizations applying our LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards e.g. practitioners, software vendors and academics. Being a community-driven open architecture and open standard access to all assets, templates, tools and artifacts is free for certified practitioners, thereby ensuring that modelling principles are applied correctly.

While it is free to join the community and no cost apply to the use of any community assets, the quality of the participating practitioners must be guaranteed, by being LEAD certified in the specific field of where they work. For organizations interested in applying LEADing Practices, we recommend contacting us and highlighting the objective and key challenges, whereafter a practitioner will be assigned to support you.

:Enterprise Engineering Standards

2015-09-09T10:59:32Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Enterprise Engineering Standards}}
The Enterprise Engineering Standards are the result of international industry experts and academic consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its various enterprise engineering activities.

<blockquote>
''We realize that organizations apply various engineering methods and approaches e.g. planning, design, testing, QA and value audit, etc. Therefore, we have ensured that all of our published Enterprise Engineering Standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Working, Modelling, Implementation and Governance.''
</blockquote>

To ensure full integration with other methods and approaches within an organization, the enterprise engineering standards have an ontology and semantic concept built in that allows for the meta objects to be reused in the other enterprise standards as well as the industry standards.

This includes applying the various standards:

* '''Engineering Principles''' - how and where it can or needs to be decomposed and composed together.
* '''Modelling Principles''' - which design concepts can or should be applied.
* '''Architecture Principles''' - which architecture rules apply and which artifacts and templates (e.g. maps, matrices and models) could or should be applied.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture.png|900px]]

Creating the ability to " '''Align, Compare & Unify''' " different enterprise standards together as well as combine them with the industry standards (or vice versa) in combining the relevant aspect e.g. meta objects.

Developing a whole new concept of agile integration and standardization in the following 4 enterprise engineering disciplines and areas:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;" |
'''ENTERPRISE ENGINEERING STANDARDS'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 30%;text-align:left;" |
'''LEAD-ES30EES'''
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Decomposition_%26_Composition_Reference_Content|
Decomposition & Composition Reference Content
]]
|LEAD-ES30001AL
|-
|[[Lifecycle Management Reference Content|
Lifecycle Management Reference Content
]]
|LEAD-ES30002AL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Testing_Reference_Content|
Testing Reference Content
]]
|LEAD-ES30003SA
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Requirement_Reference_Content|
Enterprise Requirement Reference Content
]]
|LEAD-ES30004ES
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Quality_Reference_Content|
Quality Reference Content
]]
|LEAD-ES30005ES
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Geographical_Information_System_%28GIS%29_Reference_Content|
Geographical Information System (GIS) Reference Content
]]
|LEAD-ES30006EM
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Agile_Reference_Content|
Agile Reference Content
]]
|LEAD-ES30007ES
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Categorization_%26_Classification_Reference_Content|
Categorization & Classification Reference Content
]]
|LEAD-ES30008ES
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Tier_Reference_Content|
Enterprise Tier Reference Content
]]
|LEAD-ES30009ES
|-
|}

 

<blockquote>
''Please note that the Enterprise Engineering Standards are only open for the LEADing Practice community members, however, some material has been made publicly available for review purposes.''
</blockquote>

Our community consist of organizations applying our LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards e.g. practitioners, software vendors and academics. Being a community-driven open architecture and open standard access to all assets, templates, tools and artifacts is free for certified practitioners, thereby ensuring that modelling principles are applied correctly.

While it is free to join the community and no cost apply to the use of any community assets, the quality of the participating practitioners must be guaranteed, by being LEAD certified in the specific field of where they work. For organizations interested in applying LEADing Practices, we recommend contacting us and highlighting the objective and key challenges, whereafter a practitioner will be assigned to support you.

:Enterprise Modelling Standards

2015-09-09T10:58:50Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Enterprise Modelling Standards}}
The Enterprise Modelling Standards are the result of international industry experts and academic consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its various enterprise modelling activities.

<blockquote>
''We realize that organizations apply various modelling methods and approaches e.g. process modelling, rules modeling and/or service modelling, etc. Therefore we have ensured that all of our published Enterprise Modelling Standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Working, Modelling, Implementation and Governance.''
</blockquote>

To ensure full integration with other methods and approaches within an organization, the enterprise modelling standards have an ontology and semantic concept built in that allows for the meta objects to be reused in the other enterprise standards as well as the industry standards.

This includes applying the various standards:
*Engineering Principles - how and where it can or needs to be decomposed and composed together.
*Modelling Principles - which design concepts can or should be applied.
*Architecture Principles - which architecture rules apply and which artifacts and templates (e.g. maps, matrices and models) could or should be applied.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture-01.png|frame|center|840px|link=http://lead.orpheus-dev.com/images/b/b7/LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture.pdf|Enterprise Engineering, Enterprise Modelling & Enterprise Architecture]]

Creating the ability to "Align, Compare & Unify" different enterprise standards together as well as combine them with the industry standards (or vice versa) in combining the relevant aspect e.g. meta objects.

Developing a whole new concept of agile integration and standardization in the following 18 enterprise modelling disciplines and areas:
{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;" |
'''ENTERPRISE MODELLING STANDARDS'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 30%;text-align:left;" |
'''LEAD-ES20EMoS'''
|-
|[[Ontology_Reference_Content|Ontology Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20000
|-
|[[Drivers_&_Forces_(external/internal)_Modelling_Reference_Content|Drivers & Forces (external/internal) Modelling Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20001PG
|-
|[[Stakeholder_Reference_Content|Stakeholder Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20002EX
|-
|[[Requirement_Modelling_Reference_Content|Requirement Modelling Reference]]
|LEAD-ES20003PG
|-
|[[Business_Model_Reference_Content|Business Model Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20004BC
|-
|[[Business_Process_Reference_Content|Business Process Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20005BP
|-
|[[Revenue_Model_Reference_Content|Revenue Model Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20006BC
|-
|[[Value_Model_Reference_Content|Value Model Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20007BCPG
|-
|[[Service_Model_Reference_Content|Service Model Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20008BCBS
|-
|[[Performance_Model_Reference_Content|Performance Model Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20009BCPG
|-
|[[Operating_Model_Reference_Content|Operating Model Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20010BC
|-
|[[Cost_Model_Reference_Content|Cost Model Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20011BCPG
|-
|[[Role_Modelling_Reference_Content|Role Modelling Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20012BC
|-
|[[Competency_Modelling_Reference_Content|Competency Modelling Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20013BC
|-
|[[Measurement_Reference_Content|Measurement Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20014PG
|-
|[[Workflow_Reference_Content|Workflow Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20015AL
|-
|[[Channel_Reference_Content|Channel Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20016AL
|-
|[[Capability_Modelling_Reference_Content|Capability Modelling Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20017AL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Sustainability_Reference_Content|Enterprise Sustainability Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20018AL
|-
|[[Case_Management_Reference_Content|Case Management Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20019AL
|-
|[[Business_Ontology_Reference_Content|Business Ontology Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20020AL
|-
|[[Meta_Modelling_Reference_Content|Meta Modelling Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20021ALL
|}

:Enterprise Management Standards

2015-09-09T10:57:57Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Enterprise Management Standards}}
The Enterprise Management Standards are the result of international industry experts and academic consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its enterprise management activities.

<blockquote>
''We realize that organizations apply various management methods and approaches to align stakeholders and organizational structures with the different value and performance drivers as well as a range of diverse business focus. Therefore we have ensured that all of our published Enterprise Management Standards from strategy management and governance to the product and production management reference content have a structured Way of Thinking, Working, Modelling, Implementation and Governance.''
</blockquote>

[[File:LEAD-Enterprise-Management-Standards-Structural-Organization.png|800px]]

To ensure full integration with other methods and approaches within an organization, the enterprise management standards have an ontology and semantic concept built in that allows for the meta objects to be reused in the other enterprise standards as well as the industry standards. Creating the ability to "'''Align, Compare & Unify'''" different enterprise standards together as well as combine them with the industry standards (or vice versa) in combining the relevant aspect e.g. meta objects, enabling an organization's capability to apply integrated management perspectives and practices.

Developing a whole new concept of agile integration and standardization in the following 21 disciplines and areas:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
|style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;" |
'''ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT STANDARDS'''
|style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 30%;text-align:left;" |
'''LEAD-ES10EMaS'''
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Enterprise_Standards:Strategy_Management_Reference_Content|Strategy Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10001PG
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Growth%3A_Core_Differentiating_%26_Core_Competitive_Reference_Content|Growth: Core Differentiating & Core Competitive Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10002BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Value_Management_Reference_Content|Value Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Performance_Management_Reference_Content|Performance Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10004PG
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Executive_Communication_%26_Story_Telling_Reference_Content|Executive Communication & Story Telling Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10005EX
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Control_Management_incl%2E_Evaluation_%26_Audit_Reference_Content|Control Management incl. Evaluation & Audit Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10006GO
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Planning_Management_Reference_Content|Planning Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10007BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Procurement_Management_Reference_Content|Procurement Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10008BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Human_Resource_Management_Reference_Content|Human Resource Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10009BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Production_Management_Reference_Content|Production Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10010BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Product_Management_Reference_Content|Product Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10011BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Marketing_Management_Reference_Content|Marketing Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10012BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Sales_%26_Customer_Service_Management_Reference_Content|Sales & Customer Service Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10013BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Call_Center_Management_Reference_Content|Call Center Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10014BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Supply_Chain_%26_Logistics_Management_Reference_Content|Supply Chain & Logistics Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10015BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Compliance_Management_Reference_Content|Compliance Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10016GO
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Risk_Management_Reference_Content|Risk Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10017AL
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Governance_Reference_Content|Governance Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10018GO
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Portfolio_Management_Reference_Content|Portfolio Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10019AL
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Program_Management_Reference_Content|Program Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10020AL
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Project_Management_Reference_Content|Project Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10021AL
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Financial_Management_Reference_Content|Financial Management Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10022BC
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Risk_Ontology_Reference_Content|Risk Ontology Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10023AL
|-
|style="background-color:white" |
[[Policy_Reference_Content|Policy Reference Content]]
|style="background-color:white" |
LEAD-ES10024PG
|}

 

Our community consist of organizations applying our LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards e.g. practitioners, software vendors and academics. Being a community-driven open architecture and open standard access to all assets, templates, tools and artifacts is free for certified practitioners, thereby ensuring that modelling principles are applied correctly.

While it is free to join the community and no cost apply to the use of any community assets, the quality of the participating practitioners must be guaranteed, by being LEAD certified in the specific field of where they work. For organizations interested in applying LEADing Practices, we recommend contacting us and highlighting the objective and key challenges, whereafter a practitioner will be assigned to support you.

:Main

2015-09-09T10:57:02Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Enterprise Standards}}
The Enterprise Standards are the result of international industry experts and academics consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its products, services or activities.

<blockquote>
''The standards describe sets of procedures that an organization needs to follow in order to replicate the ability to identify, create and realize value in the specified area and subject.''
</blockquote>

We develop Enterprise Standards in the following 6 areas:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''ENTERPRISE STANDARD'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT#'''
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Management_Standards|Enterprise Management Standards]]
|LEAD-ES10
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Modelling_Standards|Enterprise Modelling Standards]]
|LEAD-ES20
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Engineering_Standards|Enterprise Engineering Standards]]
|LEAD-ES30
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Architecture_Standards|Enterprise Architecture Standards]]
|LEAD-ES40
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Information_%26_Technology_Standards|Enterprise Information & Technology Standards]]
|LEAD-ES50
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Transformation_%26_Innovation_Standards|Enterprise Tranfsormation & Innovation Standards]]
|LEAD-ES60
|-
|}
 
Today, more than 3000 people in the above 6 areas has developed and worked with the 94 different Enterprise Standards.

:Main

2015-09-09T10:55:45Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Enterprise Standards}}
The Enterprise Standards are the result of international industry experts and academics consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its products, services or activities.

<blockquote>
''The standards describe sets of procedures that an organization needs to follow in order to replicate the ability to identify, create and realize value in the specified area and subject.''
</blockquote>

We develop Enterprise Standards in the following 6 areas:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''ENTERPRISE STANDARD'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT#'''
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Management_Standards|Enterprise Management Standards]]
|LEAD-ES10
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Modelling_Standards|Enterprise Modelling Standards]]
|LEAD-ES20
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Requirement_Reference_Content|Enterprise Requirement Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES20
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Engineering_Standards|Enterprise Engineering Standards]]
|LEAD-ES30
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Architecture_Standards|Enterprise Architecture Standards]]
|LEAD-ES40
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Information_%26_Technology_Standards|Enterprise Information & Technology Standards]]
|LEAD-ES50
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Enterprise_Transformation_%26_Innovation_Standards|Enterprise Tranfsormation & Innovation Standards]]
|LEAD-ES60
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Layered_Enterprise_Architecture_Reference_Content|Layered Enterprise Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Process_Architecture_Reference_Content|Process Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Value_Architecture_Reference_Content|Value Architecture Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60
|}
 
Today, more than 3000 people in the above 6 areas has developed and worked with the 94 different Enterprise Standards.

:Government Standards & User Groups

2015-09-09T10:54:18Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Government User Group & Industry Standard Committee}}
The LEADing Practice Government User Group & Industry Standard Committee is a non-profit organization that provides a global platform for governments, public sector institutions, faculties, academics, thought-leaders and LEADing practitioners and researchers to share best practices, conduct research and explore new ideas to continuously improve assets and tools for the future and how to apply them.

The user group is leading the tailoring and development of industry-specific standards and career certification programs that are applied in specific and ongoing projects.

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;" |
'''GOVERNMENT USER GROUPS & STANDARD COMMITTEES'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT#'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Defence (Public)|Defence (Public)]]
|LEAD-IS60001
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Finance & Treasury|Finance & Treasury]]
|LEAD-IS60002
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Customs & Border Services|Customs & Border Services]]
|LEAD-IS60003
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Foreign Affairs & Trade|Foreign Affairs & Trade]]
|LEAD-IS60004
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Health|Health]]
|LEAD-IS60005
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Agriculture & Food|Agriculture & Food]]
|LEAD-IS60006
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Labor & Social Services|Labor & Social Services]]
|LEAD-IS60007
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Secret Intelligence Services|Secret Intelligence Services]]
|LEAD-IS60008
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Social Services|Social Services]]
|LEAD-IS60009
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Energy & Natural Resources|Energy & Natural Resources]]
|LEAD-IS60010
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Education|Education]]
|LEAD-IS60011
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Environment|Environment]]
|LEAD-IS60012
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Tourism|Tourism]]
|LEAD-IS60013
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Transport & Infrastructure|Transport & Infrastructure]]
|LEAD-IS60014
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Justice|Justice]]
|LEAD-IS60015
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Culture|Culture]]
|LEAD-IS60016
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Local Government|Local Government]]
|LEAD-IS60016
|-
|}

:Energy Standards & User Groups

2015-09-09T10:53:45Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Energy User Group & Industry Standard Committee}}
The LEADing Practice Energy User Group & Industry Standard Committee are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our user groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user group is devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

All of the work done by the energy user group is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main energy industry standards, and thereby the sub-industry standards and working groups.

'''Overview of the Energy User Groups & Industry Standard Committees'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''ENERGY USER GROUPS & STANDARD COMMITTEES'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Oil_%26_Gas|Oil & Gas]]
|LEAD-IS50001
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Oil_%26_Gas_Producers|Oil & Gas Producers]]
|LEAD-IS50002
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Oil_Equipment_%26_Services_%26_Distribution|Oil Equipment & Services & Distribution]]
|LEAD-IS50003
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Alternative_Energy|Alternative Energy]]
|LEAD-IS50004
|-
|}

:Consumer Goods Standards & User Groups

2015-09-09T10:53:29Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Consumer Goods User Group & Industry Standard Committee}}
The LEADing Practice Consumer Goods User Group & Industry Standard Committee are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our user groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user group is devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

All of the work done by the consumer goods user group is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main consumer goods industry standards, and thereby the sub-industry standards and working groups.

'''Overview of the Consumer Goods User Groups & Industry Standard Committees'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''CONSUMER GOODS USER GROUPS & STANDARD COMMITTEES'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Automobiles & Parts|Automobiles & Parts]]
|LEAD-IS30001
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Food|Food]]
|LEAD-IS30002
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Beverage|Beverage]]
|LEAD-IS30003
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Tobacco|Tobacco]]
|LEAD-IS30004
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Consumer Durable & Apparel Goods|Consumer Durable & Apparel Goods]]
|LEAD-IS30005
|-
|}

:Consumer Services Standards & User Groups

2015-09-09T10:52:28Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Consumer Services User Group & Industry Standard Committee}}
The LEADing Practice Consumer Services User Group & Industry Standard Committee are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our user groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user group is devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

All of the work done by the consumer services user group is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main consumer services industry standards, and thereby the sub-industry standards and working groups.

'''Overview of the Consumer Services User Groups & Industry Standard Committees'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''CONSUMER SERVICES USER GROUPS & STANDARD COMMITTEES'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Retail|Retail]]
|LEAD-IS40001
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Media|Media]]
|LEAD-IS40002
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Postal|Postal]]
|LEAD-IS40003
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Travel & Leisure|Travel & Leisure]]
|LEAD-IS40004
|-
|}

:Consumer Services Standards & User Groups

2015-09-09T10:51:49Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Consumer Services User Group & Industry Standard Committee}}
The LEADing Practice Consumer Services User Group & Industry Standard Committee are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our user groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user group is devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

All of the work done by the consumer services user group is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main consumer services industry standards, and thereby the sub-industry standards and working groups.

'''Overview of the Consumer Services User Groups & Industry Standard Committees'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''INDUSTRIAL USER GROUPS & STANDARD COMMITTEES'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Retail|Retail]]
|LEAD-IS40001
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Media|Media]]
|LEAD-IS40002
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Postal|Postal]]
|LEAD-IS40003
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Travel & Leisure|Travel & Leisure]]
|LEAD-IS40004
|-
|}

:Consumer Goods Standards & User Groups

2015-09-09T10:50:38Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Consumer Goods User Group & Industry Standard Committee}}
The LEADing Practice Consumer Goods User Group & Industry Standard Committee are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our user groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user group is devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

All of the work done by the consumer goods user group is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main consumer goods industry standards, and thereby the sub-industry standards and working groups.

'''Overview of the Consumer Goods User Groups & Industry Standard Committees'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''INDUSTRIAL USER GROUPS & STANDARD COMMITTEES'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Automobiles & Parts|Automobiles & Parts]]
|LEAD-IS30001
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Food|Food]]
|LEAD-IS30002
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Beverage|Beverage]]
|LEAD-IS30003
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Tobacco|Tobacco]]
|LEAD-IS30004
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Consumer Durable & Apparel Goods|Consumer Durable & Apparel Goods]]
|LEAD-IS30005
|-
|}

:Consumer Goods Standards & User Groups

2015-09-09T10:50:25Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Consumer Goods User Group & Industry Standard Committee}}
The LEADing Practice Consumer Goods User Group & Industry Standard Committee are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our user groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user group is devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

All of the work done by the consumer goods user group is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main consumer goods industry standards, and thereby the sub-industry standards and working groups.

'''Overview of the Consumer Goods User Groups & Industry Standard Committees'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''INDUSTRIAL USER GROUPS & STANDARD COMMITTEES'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Automobiles & Parts|Automobiles & Parts]]
|LEAD-IS30001
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Food|Food]]
|LEAD-IS30002
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Beverage|Beverage]]
|LEAD-IS30003
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Tobacco|Tobacco]]
|LEAD-IS30004
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Consumer Durable & Apparel Goods|Consumer Durable & Apparel Goods]]
|LEAD-IS30005
|-
|}

If you are interested in joining our Consumer Goods User Group and get access to the user group's Industry Standards, [[#|please fill out this form.]]

:Industrial Standards & User Groups

2015-09-09T10:48:53Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Industrial User Group & Industry Standard Committee}}
The LEADing Practice Industrial User Group & Industry Standard Committee are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our user groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user group is devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

All of the work done by the industrial user group is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main industrial industry standards, and thereby the sub-industry standards and working groups.

'''Overview of the Industrial User Groups & Industry Standard Committees'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''INDUSTRIAL USER GROUPS & STANDARD COMMITTEES'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Aerospace & Defense|Aerospace & Defense]]
|LEAD-IS20001
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Automotive|Automotive]]
|LEAD-IS20002
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Chemicals|Chemicals]]
|LEAD-IS20003
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Forestry & Paper|Forestry & Paper]]
|LEAD-IS20004
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Mining|Mining]]
|LEAD-IS20005
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Construction & Materials|Construction & Materials]]
|LEAD-IS20006
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Electronic & Electrical Equipment|Electronic & Electrical Equipment]]
|LEAD-IS20007
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Industrial Engineering|Industrial Engineering]]
|LEAD-IS20008
|-
|}

:Industrial Standards & User Groups

2015-09-09T10:48:27Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Industrial User Group & Industry Standard Committee}}
The LEADing Practice Industrial User Group & Industry Standard Committee are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our user groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user group is devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

All of the work done by the industrial user group is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main industrial industry standards, and thereby the sub-industry standards and working groups.

'''Overview of the Industrial User Groups & Industry Standard Committees'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''INDUSTRIAL USER GROUPS & STANDARD COMMITTEES'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|Industry_Standards:Aerospace & Defense|Aerospace & Defense]]
|LEAD-IS20001
|-
|Industry_Standards:Automotive|Automotive]]
|LEAD-IS20002
|-
|Industry_Standards:Chemicals|Chemicals]]
|LEAD-IS20003
|-
|Industry_Standards:Forestry & Paper|Forestry & Paper]]
|LEAD-IS20004
|-
|Industry_Standards:Mining|Mining]]
|LEAD-IS20005
|-
|Industry_Standards:Construction & Materials|Construction & Materials]]
|LEAD-IS20006
|-
|Industry_Standards:Electronic & Electrical Equipment|Electronic & Electrical Equipment]]
|LEAD-IS20007
|-
|Industry_Standards:Industrial Engineering|Industrial Engineering]]
|LEAD-IS20008
|-
|}

:Alternative Energy

2015-09-09T10:46:01Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Alternative Energy}}
[[Category:Energy Standards & User Groups]]

:Postal

2015-09-09T10:44:23Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Postal}}
[[Category:Consumer Services Standards & User Groups]]

:Retail

2015-09-09T10:43:52Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Retail}}
[[Category:Consumer Services Standards & User Groups]]

:Tobacco

2015-09-09T10:43:17Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Tobacco}}
[[Category:Consumer Goods Standards & User Groups]]

:Beverage

2015-09-09T10:43:02Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Beverage}}
[[Category:Consumer Goods Standards & User Groups]]

:Food

2015-09-09T10:42:37Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Food}}
[[Category:Consumer Goods Standards & User Groups]]

:Industrial Engineering

2015-09-09T10:38:27Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Industrial Engineering}}
[[Category:Industrial Standards & User Groups]]

:Electronic & Electrical Equipment

2015-09-09T10:37:58Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Electronic & Electrical Equipment}}
[[Category:Industrial Standards & User Groups]]

Objects:Meta Object Nature

2015-09-04T06:28:12Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Meta Object Nature}}

<div class="nature">
<onlyinclude></onlyinclude>{| class="wikitable"
!colspan="17"|Conceptual & Logical Object Clustering
|-
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#575757;"| LEAD Meta Object !! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #48D0FF"|Purpose & Goal
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #0B98D6"|Business Competency
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #014480" |Business Service
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #1F992D"|Business Process
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #F7B206"|Application
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #F08D00"|Data
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #DC5028"|Platform
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #A0281E"|Infrastructure
|-
|#
|Name
|#
|Name
|#
|Name
|
|
|#
|Name
|#
|Name
|#
|Name
|#
|Name
|-
| rowspan="3" |'''Type**'''
|H
|High
|(D)
|Core Differentiating
|(R)
|Management
|(R)
|Management
|
|
|(A)
|Master
|
|
|
|
|-
||M
|Medium
|(C)
|Core Competitive
|(M)
|Main
|(M)
|Main
|
|
|(E)
|Meta
|
|
|
|
|-
|L
|Low
|(N)
|Non-Core
|(S)
|Supporting
|(S)
|Supporting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="5" |'''Level *(decomposition)'''
|1
|SBOs
|1
|Competency Area
|1
|Service Area
|1
|Process Area
|1
|Component
|1
|Component
|1
|Component
|1
|Component
|-
|2
|BPIs
|2
|Competency Group
|2
|Service Group
|2
|Process Group
|2
|Module
|2
|Data Object
|2
|Device
|2
|Device
|-
|3
|CSFs
|3
|Business Competency
|3
|Business Service
|3
|Business Process
|3
|Function
|3
|Entity
|3
|Function
|3
|Function
|-
|4
|KPIs
|
|
|
|
|4
|Steps
|4
|Task
|4
|Data Service
|4
|Platform Service
|4
|Infrastructure Service
|-
|5
|PPIs/SPI
|
|
|
|
|5
|Activities
|5
|Service
|5
|Data Table
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="3" |'''Tiers*'''
|S
|Strategic
|S
|Strategic
|
|
|S
|Strategic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|T
|Tactical
|T
|Tactical
|
|
|T
|Tactical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|O
|Operational
|O
|Operational
|
|
|O
|Operational
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="3" |'''Nature**'''
|
|
|n.a.
|Simple/Static
|n.a.
|Simple/Static
|n.a.
|Simple/Static
|
|
|
|Structured
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|
|n.a.
|Generic/Hybrid
|n.a.
|Generic/Hybrid
|n.a.
|Generic/Hybrid
|
|
|
|Unstructured
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|
|n.a.
|Complex/Dynamic
|n.a.
|Complex/Dynamic
|n.a.
|Complex/Dynamic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}
</div>

<nowiki>*Classify = to assemble by order
</nowiki> **Categorize = to divide into groups

[[Category:Objects]]

Objects:Meta Object Nature

2015-09-04T06:27:28Z

90.185.212.37:

<div class="nature">
<onlyinclude></onlyinclude>{| class="wikitable"
!colspan="17"|Conceptual & Logical Object Clustering
|-
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#575757;"| LEAD Meta Object !! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #48D0FF"|Purpose & Goal
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #0B98D6"|Business Competency
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #014480" |Business Service
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #1F992D"|Business Process
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #F7B206"|Application
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #F08D00"|Data
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #DC5028"|Platform
! colspan="2" style="color:white; background-color: #A0281E"|Infrastructure
|-
|#
|Name
|#
|Name
|#
|Name
|
|
|#
|Name
|#
|Name
|#
|Name
|#
|Name
|-
| rowspan="3" |'''Type**'''
|H
|High
|(D)
|Core Differentiating
|(R)
|Management
|(R)
|Management
|
|
|(A)
|Master
|
|
|
|
|-
||M
|Medium
|(C)
|Core Competitive
|(M)
|Main
|(M)
|Main
|
|
|(E)
|Meta
|
|
|
|
|-
|L
|Low
|(N)
|Non-Core
|(S)
|Supporting
|(S)
|Supporting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="5" |'''Level *(decomposition)'''
|1
|SBOs
|1
|Competency Area
|1
|Service Area
|1
|Process Area
|1
|Component
|1
|Component
|1
|Component
|1
|Component
|-
|2
|BPIs
|2
|Competency Group
|2
|Service Group
|2
|Process Group
|2
|Module
|2
|Data Object
|2
|Device
|2
|Device
|-
|3
|CSFs
|3
|Business Competency
|3
|Business Service
|3
|Business Process
|3
|Function
|3
|Entity
|3
|Function
|3
|Function
|-
|4
|KPIs
|
|
|
|
|4
|Steps
|4
|Task
|4
|Data Service
|4
|Platform Service
|4
|Infrastructure Service
|-
|5
|PPIs/SPI
|
|
|
|
|5
|Activities
|5
|Service
|5
|Data Table
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="3" |'''Tiers*'''
|S
|Strategic
|S
|Strategic
|
|
|S
|Strategic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|T
|Tactical
|T
|Tactical
|
|
|T
|Tactical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|O
|Operational
|O
|Operational
|
|
|O
|Operational
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="3" |'''Nature**'''
|
|
|n.a.
|Simple/Static
|n.a.
|Simple/Static
|n.a.
|Simple/Static
|
|
|
|Structured
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|
|n.a.
|Generic/Hybrid
|n.a.
|Generic/Hybrid
|n.a.
|Generic/Hybrid
|
|
|
|Unstructured
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|
|n.a.
|Complex/Dynamic
|n.a.
|Complex/Dynamic
|n.a.
|Complex/Dynamic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}
</div>
<nowiki>*Classify = to assemble by order
</nowiki> **Categorize = to divide into groups

[[Category:Objects]]

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Meta Object Nature}}

:Value Management Reference Content

2015-09-03T12:47:53Z

90.185.212.37:

The LEADing Practice Value Management Reference Content is the result of research, industry expert and academic consensus and agreement.

The Value Way of Working is critical discipline of translating both strategic planning and effective execution. Structure the arrangement of effort and work, by translating the “Way of Thinking” into a structural way of working. The Way of Working organizes, classifies, aligns, arranges, quantifies, recommends and selects the value objects and with it the relevant value template in a systemized and categorized way they need to be de-composed (broken down) or composed (related) together.

The Way of Working is where one defines the best suitable technique, manner, routine and method that will help the practitioner to ensure integrity, accuracy and completeness of each particular task related to the rule that ensures the right value relation. The value way of working is therefore a series of phases with a collection of activities that the user of the value methods needs to follow and undertake in order to reach a specific goal/outcome. The below specified way of working, therefore structures the practitioner’s techniques in applying the right semantic principles, rules, procedures
and practices.

<blockquote>

Uncover the many [[Membership_benefits|member benefits ]] you receive from getting access to our [[Enterprise_Standards:main|Enterprise Standards]]. If you would like to get access to our Value Enterprise Standards and the reference content and its accelerators, [[Access_To_Reference_Content|please fill out this form]].

</blockquote>

Below are some examples of the Value Management Reference Content:
{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 45%;text-align:left;" |
'''Standard/Template'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;" |
'''Reference Content'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 15%;text-align:left;" |
'''ID #'''
|-
|[[Media:Hostic.pdf|Holistic View on Scorecards & Dashboards]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Reference-Content-Measurements-Value-Reporting-Model-Extended.pdf|Measurements & Value Reporting Model (Extended)]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Reference-Content-Scorecard-Performance-Map-Cost-Cutting.pdf|Example Scorecard - Performance Map (Cost Cutting)]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Reference-Content-Scorecard-Performance-Map-Cost-Efficiency.pdf|Example Scorecard - Performance Map (Cost Efficiency)]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Reference-Content-Scorecard-Performance-Map-Lower-Risk.pdf|Example Scorecard - Performance Map (Lower Risk)]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Reference-Content-Scorecard-Performance-Map.pdf|Example Scorecard - Performance Map]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Tasks-Services.pdf|Way of Thinking around Value: Tasks & Services]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Value-Management-Lifecycle.pdf|Value Management Lifecycle]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Value-Matrix.pdf|Example of a Value Matrix]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Reference-Content-BSC-Cost-Cutting.pdf|Example of a Balanced Scorecard - Cost Cutting]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Reference-Content-BSC-Customs-Border-Services.pdf|Example of a Balanced Scorecard - Customs & Border Services]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Reference-Content-Chart-Value-Planning-Creation-Realization.pdf|Example Value Chart: Value Planning & Creation & Realization]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Reference-Content-Cockpits-Dashboards-Scorecards.pdf|Cockpits & Dashboards & Scorecards]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:Value-Management-Reference-Content-Consolidated-Actuals.pdf|Consolidated Actuals]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|-
|[[Media:LEAD-Value-Reference-Framework-Enterprise-Value-Tree.pdf|Value Reference Content Poster]]
|Value Management Reference Content
|LEAD-ES10003PG
|}

:Main

2015-09-03T12:47:18Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Industry Standards}}

=== Industry User Groups ===

Our Industry User Groups are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our Industry User Groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user groups are devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

<blockquote>
''Uncover the many [[#|member benefits]] you receive from joining an [[#|Industry User Group]]. If you are interested in joining a user group and get access to that user group's industry standards, [[#|please fill out this form.]]''
</blockquote>

Sometimes a specific user group is devoted to a narrow range of industry ideas and concepts or has strict confidentiality or security requirements. In such a case, the industry user group is closed and does not collaborate with the other industry user groups.

However, all user group work is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main 11 industry standards and thereby user groups with the 51 sub-industry standards and working groups that we have.

'''Overview of the Industry Standards'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''INDUSTRY STANDARD'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Financial_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Financials]]
|LEAD-IS10
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Industrial_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Industrial]]
|LEAD-IS20
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Consumer_Goods_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Consumer Goods]]
|LEAD-IS30
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Consumer_Services_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Consumer Services]]
|LEAD-IS40
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Energy_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Energy]]
|LEAD-IS50
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Government_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Government]]
|LEAD-IS60
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Healthcare_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Healthcare]]
|LEAD-IS70
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Utilities_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Utilities]]
|LEAD-IS80
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Transportation_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Transportation]]
|LEAD-IS90
|-
|[[#|Telecommunication]]
|LEAD-IS11
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Information_Technology_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Information Technology]]
|LEAD-IS12
|}

The industry standards published by LEADing Practice are the last stage of a long process that commonly starts with the proposal of new ideas, then follows a series of development steps and phases, whereafter the final release and publication of the standard is agreed upon and concluded by the Industry Standard Committees.

The following abbreviations ared used for development and amendment of each industry standard (with an indication of its status):

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''DESCRIPTION'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''FORMAL ABBREVIATION'''
|-
|Industry Standard Proposal
|LEAD-ISP
|-
|Industry Standard Draft
|LEAD-ISD
|-
|Industry Standard
|LEAD-IS
|-
|Industry Standard Amendment
|LEAD-ISA
|-
|Specification & Report
|LEAD-TR
|-
|Publicly Available Specification
|LEAD-PAS
|-
|Available Trends Assessment
|LEAD-ATA
|-
|}

:Main

2015-09-03T12:46:16Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Industry Standards}}

[[File:Industry-User-Groups-01.png]]

=== Industry User Groups ===

Our Industry User Groups are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our Industry User Groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user groups are devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

<blockquote>
''Uncover the many [[#|member benefits]] you receive from joining an [[#|Industry User Group]]. If you are interested in joining a user group and get access to that user group's industry standards, [[#|please fill out this form.]]''
</blockquote>

Sometimes a specific user group is devoted to a narrow range of industry ideas and concepts or has strict confidentiality or security requirements. In such a case, the industry user group is closed and does not collaborate with the other industry user groups.

However, all user group work is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main 11 industry standards and thereby user groups with the 51 sub-industry standards and working groups that we have.

'''Overview of the Industry Standards'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''INDUSTRY STANDARD'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Financial_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Financials]]
|LEAD-IS10
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Industrial_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Industrial]]
|LEAD-IS20
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Consumer_Goods_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Consumer Goods]]
|LEAD-IS30
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Consumer_Services_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Consumer Services]]
|LEAD-IS40
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Energy_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Energy]]
|LEAD-IS50
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Government_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Government]]
|LEAD-IS60
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Healthcare_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Healthcare]]
|LEAD-IS70
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Utilities_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Utilities]]
|LEAD-IS80
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Transportation_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Transportation]]
|LEAD-IS90
|-
|[[#|Telecommunication]]
|LEAD-IS11
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Information_Technology_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Information Technology]]
|LEAD-IS12
|}

The industry standards published by LEADing Practice are the last stage of a long process that commonly starts with the proposal of new ideas, then follows a series of development steps and phases, whereafter the final release and publication of the standard is agreed upon and concluded by the Industry Standard Committees.

The following abbreviations ared used for development and amendment of each industry standard (with an indication of its status):

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''DESCRIPTION'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''FORMAL ABBREVIATION'''
|-
|Industry Standard Proposal
|LEAD-ISP
|-
|Industry Standard Draft
|LEAD-ISD
|-
|Industry Standard
|LEAD-IS
|-
|Industry Standard Amendment
|LEAD-ISA
|-
|Specification & Report
|LEAD-TR
|-
|Publicly Available Specification
|LEAD-PAS
|-
|Available Trends Assessment
|LEAD-ATA
|-
|}

:Main

2015-09-03T12:46:01Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Alignment & Unity Reference Content}}

[[File:Industry-User-Groups-01.png]]

=== Industry User Groups ===

Our Industry User Groups are sets and collections of industry organizations and people who share similar industry interests, goals, and/or concerns. As our Industry User Groups have members distributed throughout the world, they communicate across different technologies from web sessions and webinars, chat capabilities, message boards, mailing lists and Skype meetings.

While the user groups are devoted to one industry or sub-industry, the subjects researched and analyzed within the industry are used as input in multiple industry standards.

<blockquote>
''Uncover the many [[#|member benefits]] you receive from joining an [[#|Industry User Group]]. If you are interested in joining a user group and get access to that user group's industry standards, [[#|please fill out this form.]]''
</blockquote>

Sometimes a specific user group is devoted to a narrow range of industry ideas and concepts or has strict confidentiality or security requirements. In such a case, the industry user group is closed and does not collaborate with the other industry user groups.

However, all user group work is documented and the industry standards they produce (open for the community or closed for only the user group) are tracked with specific industry standard reference content numbers that relate to the main 11 industry standards and thereby user groups with the 51 sub-industry standards and working groups that we have.

'''Overview of the Industry Standards'''

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''INDUSTRY STANDARD'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''REFERENCE CONTENT #'''
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Financial_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Financials]]
|LEAD-IS10
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Industrial_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Industrial]]
|LEAD-IS20
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Consumer_Goods_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Consumer Goods]]
|LEAD-IS30
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Consumer_Services_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Consumer Services]]
|LEAD-IS40
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Energy_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Energy]]
|LEAD-IS50
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Government_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Government]]
|LEAD-IS60
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Healthcare_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Healthcare]]
|LEAD-IS70
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Utilities_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Utilities]]
|LEAD-IS80
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Transportation_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Transportation]]
|LEAD-IS90
|-
|[[#|Telecommunication]]
|LEAD-IS11
|-
|[[Industry_Standards:Information_Technology_Standards_%26_User_Groups|Information Technology]]
|LEAD-IS12
|}

The industry standards published by LEADing Practice are the last stage of a long process that commonly starts with the proposal of new ideas, then follows a series of development steps and phases, whereafter the final release and publication of the standard is agreed upon and concluded by the Industry Standard Committees.

The following abbreviations ared used for development and amendment of each industry standard (with an indication of its status):

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''DESCRIPTION'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''FORMAL ABBREVIATION'''
|-
|Industry Standard Proposal
|LEAD-ISP
|-
|Industry Standard Draft
|LEAD-ISD
|-
|Industry Standard
|LEAD-IS
|-
|Industry Standard Amendment
|LEAD-ISA
|-
|Specification & Report
|LEAD-TR
|-
|Publicly Available Specification
|LEAD-PAS
|-
|Available Trends Assessment
|LEAD-ATA
|-
|}

:Alignment & Unity Reference Content

2015-09-03T12:42:35Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Alignment & Unity Reference Content}}

The Alignment & Unity reference content provides the practitioner with a holistic:
#'''Way of Thinking (Stage 1):''' Development of a common understanding, so that a common point of view can be built that enables the organization with a way to compare and contrast. The way of thinking should be used by stakeholders involved in all planning activities around alignment and unification.
#'''Way of Working (Stage 2):''' Development of a common way of describing the alignment of objects that have been identified in the way of thinking. The way of working should be used by individuals or teams involved in describing the common objects and the detailed requirements.
#'''Way of Alignment Modeling (Stage 3):''' Development of a common way of modeling and designing which takes the previously identified common objects and detailed requirements and translates them into aligned sets of deliverables that can be used to execute business transformation and innovation through portfolios, programs and projects.

[[File:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Unity-Model-01.png|thumb|800px|Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content Poster]]

'''Solving the Alignment Management Challenges'''

Most stakeholders across the enterprise landscape have some of the same external and internal forces and drivers influencing them, but they have different approaches. These stakeholders don’t see what is common, and therefore don’t know how (or why) to work together. This indicates a lack of alignment maturity and results in enterprise strategy, management and operations that are disjointed, and does not provide the expected return on investment. The top twelve inhibitors to achieve alignment of effort as identified by stakeholders are:
#Stove pipes/silos (lack of information sharing)
#No visibility of efforts and activities
#Duplication of efforts and investments
#Lack of planning resources
#No established process (ad hoc)
#No collective repository of information
#No forcing function to drive alignment effort
#Conflicts in planning timelines
#Random acts of goodness (uncoordinated)
#Competing priorities
#Differing lexicon/taxonomy/language/vocabulary/semantics
#Disparate activities

Based on these high level alignment inhibitors that were identified, LEADing Practice has developed an Alignment Management framework to solve these issues across organizational levels.

The LEADing Practice Alignment & Unity reference content has the purpose to identify, develop and tailor Alignment & Unity-specific standards and templates that are applied in specific and ongoing projects. Some of the standards and templates of the reference content (including reference content that was used during the 3 stages of the Alignment & Unity Model above) are:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''Standard/Template'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 30%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''Reference Content'''
|-
|[[#|Strategic Alignment Map]]
|Competency
|-
|[[F|Tactical Alignment Map]]
|Competency
|-
|[[#|Operational Alignment Map]]
|Competency
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Management-Stage-1-Way-of-Thinking-01.png|Alignment Management Stage 1]]
|Requirements
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Management-Stage-2-Way-of-Working-01.png|Alignment Management Stage 2]]
|Requirements
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Management-Stage-3-Way-of-Modeling-01.png]]
|Requirements
|-
|[[#|Stakeholder Expectations Alignment]]
|Value
|-
|[[#|Stakeholder Objective Alignment]]
|Value
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Stages-of-the-Alignment-Management-Framework-01.png|Stages of the Alignment Management Framework]]
|Maturity
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Maturity-Quick-Scan-01.png|Alignment Maturity Quick Scan]]
|Maturity
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Maturity-Benchmark-01.png|Alignment Maturity Benchmark]]
|Maturity
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Maturity-TCO-ROI-Evaluation-01.png|Alignment Maturity TCO-ROI Evaluation]]
|Maturity
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Spider-web-Maturity-Assessment-01.png|Spider-web Maturity Assessment]]
|Maturity
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Development-Path-01.png|Alignment Development Path]]
|Maturity
|-
|}

'''Background of the Alignment & Unity Reference Content'''

The Alignment & Unity concept was developed for the US Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State with the aim to:
*Unify common stakeholders, objectives and size the common mission-critical aspects across complex missions and multi-dimensional warfare such as cyberwar, the combating of weapons of mass destruction, combating translation organization crime and security corporations.
*Achieve information sharing, unity of effort to meet national security, US Department of Defense with the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State.

<blockquote>
''After reviewing over 350 projects in both private and public organizations, the board of Global University Alliance, consisting of over 300 universities and the executive board of LEADing Practice community, consisting of over 3100 certified practitioners have unanimously decided to award the US Government and specifically the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State with the [[#|“The Frontier Runner of the Year”]] award in recognition of their innovation and development of a Unification Framework.''
</blockquote>

While the Alignment & Unity reference content is jointly owned by the US Government and the LEADing Practice community, it can be freely used by anybody who has received adequate training in how to use it. The contact persons are:
*Developers and practitioners: Mr. Ken Teske and Mike Tisdel, US Government contractors.
*Alignment & Unity reference content architect: Professor Mark von Rosing, Global University Alliance.
*Alignment & Unity reference content coordinator: Henrik von Scheel, LEADing Practice, CEO.

'''Government of Canada TBS (Treasury Board Secretariat) and CBSA (Canadian Border Services Agency)'''

The TBS and CBSA branches of the Government of Canada recently transformed and optimized their organizations through using the Alignment & Unity reference content. An entirely customized version of the reference content was created as a pyramid for this particular project. The pyramid beautifully summarizes the alignment and unification intentions and initiatives of both organizations.

[[File:Henrik-with-Pyramid.png|thumb|900px|The Alignment & Unity Pyramid presented by Henrik von Scheel, CEO at LEADing Practice.]]

:Alignment & Unity Reference Content

2015-09-03T12:42:14Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE: Alignment & Unity Reference Content}}

The Alignment & Unity reference content provides the practitioner with a holistic:
#'''Way of Thinking (Stage 1):''' Development of a common understanding, so that a common point of view can be built that enables the organization with a way to compare and contrast. The way of thinking should be used by stakeholders involved in all planning activities around alignment and unification.
#'''Way of Working (Stage 2):''' Development of a common way of describing the alignment of objects that have been identified in the way of thinking. The way of working should be used by individuals or teams involved in describing the common objects and the detailed requirements.
#'''Way of Alignment Modeling (Stage 3):''' Development of a common way of modeling and designing which takes the previously identified common objects and detailed requirements and translates them into aligned sets of deliverables that can be used to execute business transformation and innovation through portfolios, programs and projects.

[[File:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Unity-Model-01.png|thumb|800px|Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content Poster]]

Solving the Alignment Management Challenges

Most stakeholders across the enterprise landscape have some of the same external and internal forces and drivers influencing them, but they have different approaches. These stakeholders don’t see what is common, and therefore don’t know how (or why) to work together. This indicates a lack of alignment maturity and results in enterprise strategy, management and operations that are disjointed, and does not provide the expected return on investment. The top twelve inhibitors to achieve alignment of effort as identified by stakeholders are:
#Stove pipes/silos (lack of information sharing)
#No visibility of efforts and activities
#Duplication of efforts and investments
#Lack of planning resources
#No established process (ad hoc)
#No collective repository of information
#No forcing function to drive alignment effort
#Conflicts in planning timelines
#Random acts of goodness (uncoordinated)
#Competing priorities
#Differing lexicon/taxonomy/language/vocabulary/semantics
#Disparate activities

Based on these high level alignment inhibitors that were identified, LEADing Practice has developed an Alignment Management framework to solve these issues across organizational levels.

The LEADing Practice Alignment & Unity reference content has the purpose to identify, develop and tailor Alignment & Unity-specific standards and templates that are applied in specific and ongoing projects. Some of the standards and templates of the reference content (including reference content that was used during the 3 stages of the Alignment & Unity Model above) are:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''Standard/Template'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 30%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''Reference Content'''
|-
|[[#|Strategic Alignment Map]]
|Competency
|-
|[[F|Tactical Alignment Map]]
|Competency
|-
|[[#|Operational Alignment Map]]
|Competency
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Management-Stage-1-Way-of-Thinking-01.png|Alignment Management Stage 1]]
|Requirements
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Management-Stage-2-Way-of-Working-01.png|Alignment Management Stage 2]]
|Requirements
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Management-Stage-3-Way-of-Modeling-01.png]]
|Requirements
|-
|[[#|Stakeholder Expectations Alignment]]
|Value
|-
|[[#|Stakeholder Objective Alignment]]
|Value
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Stages-of-the-Alignment-Management-Framework-01.png|Stages of the Alignment Management Framework]]
|Maturity
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Maturity-Quick-Scan-01.png|Alignment Maturity Quick Scan]]
|Maturity
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Maturity-Benchmark-01.png|Alignment Maturity Benchmark]]
|Maturity
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Maturity-TCO-ROI-Evaluation-01.png|Alignment Maturity TCO-ROI Evaluation]]
|Maturity
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Spider-web-Maturity-Assessment-01.png|Spider-web Maturity Assessment]]
|Maturity
|-
|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Development-Path-01.png|Alignment Development Path]]
|Maturity
|-
|}

'''Background of the Alignment & Unity Reference Content'''

The Alignment & Unity concept was developed for the US Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State with the aim to:
*Unify common stakeholders, objectives and size the common mission-critical aspects across complex missions and multi-dimensional warfare such as cyberwar, the combating of weapons of mass destruction, combating translation organization crime and security corporations.
*Achieve information sharing, unity of effort to meet national security, US Department of Defense with the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State.

<blockquote>
''After reviewing over 350 projects in both private and public organizations, the board of Global University Alliance, consisting of over 300 universities and the executive board of LEADing Practice community, consisting of over 3100 certified practitioners have unanimously decided to award the US Government and specifically the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State with the [[#|“The Frontier Runner of the Year”]] award in recognition of their innovation and development of a Unification Framework.''
</blockquote>

While the Alignment & Unity reference content is jointly owned by the US Government and the LEADing Practice community, it can be freely used by anybody who has received adequate training in how to use it. The contact persons are:
*Developers and practitioners: Mr. Ken Teske and Mike Tisdel, US Government contractors.
*Alignment & Unity reference content architect: Professor Mark von Rosing, Global University Alliance.
*Alignment & Unity reference content coordinator: Henrik von Scheel, LEADing Practice, CEO.

'''Government of Canada TBS (Treasury Board Secretariat) and CBSA (Canadian Border Services Agency)'''

The TBS and CBSA branches of the Government of Canada recently transformed and optimized their organizations through using the Alignment & Unity reference content. An entirely customized version of the reference content was created as a pyramid for this particular project. The pyramid beautifully summarizes the alignment and unification intentions and initiatives of both organizations.

[[File:Henrik-with-Pyramid.png|thumb|900px|The Alignment & Unity Pyramid presented by Henrik von Scheel, CEO at LEADing Practice.]]

:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards

2015-09-03T11:09:07Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards}}

=== Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards ===

The Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards are the result of international industry experts and academic consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its various enterprise transformation activities.

Today, 72% of all IT projects fail to deliver on time, on budget and on value*. This represents economic and productivity losses of $3 trillion (4.7 % of global GDP) due to the lack of understanding of 1) the difference between transformation and innovation and 2) don't know where to start.**

<blockquote>
''We realize that organizations apply various transformation and innovation methods and approaches e.g. Change Management, LEAN, TQM, Zero Defect and Business Transformation & Innovation Enablement (BITE), etc. Therefore, we have ensured that all of our published Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Working, Modelling, Implementation and Governance.''
</blockquote>

To ensure full integration with other methods and approaches within an organization, the enterprise transformation and innovation standards have an ontology and semantic concept built in that allows for the meta objects to be reused in the other enterprise standards as well as the industry standards.

This includes applying the various standards used within transformation:
*'''Management Principles''' - to define the purpose and goals as well as to administer, govern and control the IT initiatives.
*'''Engineering Principles''' - how and where it can or needs to be decomposed and composed together.
*'''Modelling Principles''' - which design concepts can or should be applied.
*'''Architecture Principles''' - which architecture rules apply and which artifacts and templates (e.g. maps, matrices and models) could or should be applied.
*'''Information & Technology''' - that enables the automation and optimization of the organization.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture-01.png|frame|center|900px|link=http://{{SERVERNAME}}/images/b/b7/LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture.pdf|Enterprise Engineering, Enterprise Modelling & Enterprise Architecture]]

Creating the ability to ''' "Align, Compare & Unify" ''' different enterprise standards together as well as combine them with the industry standards (or vice versa) in combining the relevant aspect e.g. meta objects.

Developing a whole new concept of agile integration and standardization in the following 12 enterprise transformation disciplines and areas:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''E TRANSFORMATION & INNOVATION STANDARDS'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''LEAD-ES60ETI'''
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Alignment_%26_Unity_Reference_Content|Alignment & Unity Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60001AL
|-
|[[#|Change Management Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60002AL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Maturity_Reference_Content|Maturity Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60003AL
|-
|[[#|Continuous Improvement Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60004AL
|-
|[[#|Organizational Development Reference Content ]]
|LEAD-ES60005AL
|-
|[[#|Optimization Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60006AL
|-
|[[#|Effectiveness Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60007AL
|-
|[[#|Efficiency Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60008AL
|-
|[[#|Re-engineering Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60009AL
|-
|[[#|Root Cause Analysis Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60010AL
|-
|[[#|Transformation Benchmarking Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60011AL
|-
|[[#|Innovation Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60012AL
|-
|[[#|Alignment of Portfolio & Program & Project (PPP) Management]]
|LEAD-ES60013AL
|-
|}

<blockquote>
''Please note that the Enterprise Transformation Standards are only open for the LEADing Practice community members, however, some material has been made publicly available for review purposes.''
</blockquote>

Our community consist of organizations applying our LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards e.g. practitioners, software vendors and academics. Being a community-driven open architecture and open standard access to all assets, templates, tools and artifacts is free for certified practitioners, thereby ensuring that modelling principles are applied correctly.

While it is free to join the community and no cost apply to the use of any community assets, the quality of the participating practitioners must be guaranteed, by being LEAD certified in the specific field of where they work. For organizations interested in applying LEADing Practices, we recommend contacting us and highlighting the objective and key challenges, whereafter a practitioner will be assigned to support you.

If you would like to get access to our extensive database of Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards and reference content, [[#|please fill out this form]].

(*) McKinsey Oxford study 2012, Delivering IT projects on time, on budget and on value, representing economic and productivity losses of $3 trillion (4.7 % of global GDP) as 45% of budget run over budget, 7% are behind schedule and 56% deliver less functionality than predicted. Achieving at least $15 million in benefits, requires spending of $59 million.

(**) Leading Practice Transformation & Innovation Research, 2011/2012. Scope: 1765 CEO´s and 2936 business leaders representing all major countries and industries.

:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards

2015-09-03T11:08:26Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards}}

=== Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards ===

The Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards are the result of international industry experts and academic consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its various enterprise transformation activities.

Today, 72% of all IT projects fail to deliver on time, on budget and on value*. This represents economic and productivity losses of $3 trillion (4.7 % of global GDP) due to the lack of understanding of 1) the difference between transformation and innovation and 2) don't know where to start.**

<blockquote>
''We realize that organizations apply various transformation and innovation methods and approaches e.g. Change Management, LEAN, TQM, Zero Defect and Business Transformation & Innovation Enablement (BITE), etc. Therefore, we have ensured that all of our published Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Working, Modelling, Implementation and Governance.''
</blockquote>

To ensure full integration with other methods and approaches within an organization, the enterprise transformation and innovation standards have an ontology and semantic concept built in that allows for the meta objects to be reused in the other enterprise standards as well as the industry standards.

This includes applying the various standards used within transformation:
*'''Management Principles''' - to define the purpose and goals as well as to administer, govern and control the IT initiatives.
*'''Engineering Principles''' - how and where it can or needs to be decomposed and composed together.
*'''Modelling Principles''' - which design concepts can or should be applied.
*'''Architecture Principles''' - which architecture rules apply and which artifacts and templates (e.g. maps, matrices and models) could or should be applied.
*'''Information & Technology''' - that enables the automation and optimization of the organization.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture-01.png|frame|center|900px|link=http://{{SERVERNAME}}/images/b/b7/LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture.pdf|Enterprise Engineering, Enterprise Modelling & Enterprise Architecture]]

Creating the ability to ''' "Align, Compare & Unify" ''' different enterprise standards together as well as combine them with the industry standards (or vice versa) in combining the relevant aspect e.g. meta objects.

Developing a whole new concept of agile integration and standardization in the following 12 enterprise transformation disciplines and areas:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''E TRANSFORMATION & INNOVATION STANDARDS'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''LEAD-ES60ETI'''
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Alignment_%26_Unity_Reference_Content|Alignment & Unity Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60001AL
|-
|[[#|Change Management Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60002AL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Maturity_Reference_Content|Maturity Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60003AL
|-
|[[#|Continuous Improvement Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60004AL
|-
|[[#|Organizational Development Reference Content ]]
|LEAD-ES60005AL
|-
|[[#|Optimization Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60006AL
|-
|[[#|Effectiveness Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60007AL
|-
|[[#|Efficiency Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60008AL
|-
|[[#|Re-engineering Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60009AL
|-
|[[#|Root Cause Analysis Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60010AL
|-
|[[#|Transformation Benchmarking Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60011AL
|-
|[[#|Innovation Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES60012AL
|-
|[[#|Alignment of Portfolio & Program & Project (PPP) Management]]
|LEAD-ES60013AL
|-
|}

<blockquote>
'''Please note that the Enterprise Transformation Standards are only open for the LEADing Practice community members, however, some material has been made publicly available for review purposes.'''
</blockquote>

Our community consist of organizations applying our LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards e.g. practitioners, software vendors and academics. Being a community-driven open architecture and open standard access to all assets, templates, tools and artifacts is free for certified practitioners, thereby ensuring that modelling principles are applied correctly.

While it is free to join the community and no cost apply to the use of any community assets, the quality of the participating practitioners must be guaranteed, by being LEAD certified in the specific field of where they work. For organizations interested in applying LEADing Practices, we recommend contacting us and highlighting the objective and key challenges, whereafter a practitioner will be assigned to support you.

If you would like to get access to our extensive database of Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards and reference content, [[#|please fill out this form]].

(*) McKinsey Oxford study 2012, Delivering IT projects on time, on budget and on value, representing economic and productivity losses of $3 trillion (4.7 % of global GDP) as 45% of budget run over budget, 7% are behind schedule and 56% deliver less functionality than predicted. Achieving at least $15 million in benefits, requires spending of $59 million.

(**) Leading Practice Transformation & Innovation Research, 2011/2012. Scope: 1765 CEO´s and 2936 business leaders representing all major countries and industries.

:Enterprise Information & Technology Standards

2015-09-03T09:05:21Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Enterprise Information & Technology Standards }}

The Enterprise Information & Technology Standards are the result of international industry experts and academic consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its various enterprise information & technology activities.

<blockquote>
''We realize that organizations apply various information & technology methods and approaches such as ITIL, COBIT, ASAP and Oracle AIM, etc. Therefore, we have ensured that all of our published Enterprise Information & Technology Standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Working, Modelling, Implementation and Governance.''
</blockquote>

To ensure full integration with other methods and approaches within an organization, the enterprise information & technology standards have an ontology and semantic concept built in that allows for the meta objects to be reused in the other enterprise standards as well as the industry standards.

This includes applying the various standards used within information & technology:
*'''Management Principles''' - to define the purpose and goals as well as to administer, govern and control the IT initiatives.
*'''Engineering Principles''' - how and where it can or needs to be decomposed and composed together.
*'''Modelling Principles''' - which design concepts can or should be applied.
*'''Architecture Principles''' - which architecture rules apply and which artifacts and templates (e.g. maps, matrices and models) could or should be applied.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture-01.png|frame|center|900px|link=http://{{SERVERNAME}}/images/b/b7/LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture.pdf|Enterprise Engineering, Enterprise Modelling & Enterprise Architecture]]

Creating the ability to '''"Align, Compare & Unify"''' different enterprise standards together as well as combine them with the industry standards (or vice versa) in combining the relevant aspect e.g. meta objects.

Developing a whole new concept of agile integration and standardization in the following 23 enterprise information & technology disciplines and areas:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''ENTERPRISE INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''LEAD-ES50EIT'''
|-
|[[#|IT Strategy Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50001PG
|-
|[[#|Business Model of IT Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50002BC
|-
|[[#|IT Process Map Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50003BP
|-
|[[#|IT Center of Competency Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50004BC
|-
|[[#|Cloud Computing Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50005CC
|-
|[[#|Cyber Security Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50007CS
|-
|[[#|Knowledge Management Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50008PGIDBC
|-
|[[#|Analytic Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50009PGIDBC
|-
|[[#|Reporting Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50010PGIDBC
|-
|[[#|Application Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50011SAIDBCBP
|-
|[[#|Application Modernization & Optimization Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50012SAIDBCBP
|-
|[[#|ERP Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50013SADIBC
|-
|[[#|Software Testing Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50014SADI
|-
|[[#|Information Management Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50015BCIDSA
|-
|[[#|Data Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50016DISABC
|-
|[[#|Rule Modelling Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50017PGBCSADI
|-
|[[#|Service-Oriented Computing Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50018ES
|-
|[[#|Platform Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50019PLES
|-
|[[#|Infrastructure Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50020IL
|-
|[[#|Social Media Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50021AL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Blueprinting_Reference_Content|Blueprinting Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50022AL
|-
|[[#|Implementation Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50023AL
|-
|[[#|Cloud Ontology Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50024ALL
|-
|}

<blockquote>
''Please note that the Enterprise Information & Technology Standards are only open for the LEADing Practice community members, however, some material has been made publicly available for review purposes.''
</blockquote>

Our community consist of organizations applying our LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards e.g. practitioners, software vendors and academics. Being a community-driven open architecture and open standard access to all assets, templates, tools and artifacts is free for certified practitioners, thereby ensuring that modelling principles are applied correctly.

While it is free to join the community and no cost apply to the use of any community assets, the quality of the participating practitioners must be guaranteed, by being LEAD certified in the specific field of where they work. For organizations interested in applying LEADing Practices, we recommend contacting us and highlighting the objective and key challenges, whereafter a practitioner will be assigned to support you.

If you would like to get access to our extensive database of Enterprise Information & Technology Standards and reference content, please fill [[#|out this form]].

:Enterprise Information & Technology Standards

2015-09-03T09:05:02Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Enterprise Information & Technology Standards }}

=== '''Enterprise Information & Technology Standards''' ===

The Enterprise Information & Technology Standards are the result of international industry experts and academic consensus. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused and replicated, and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its various enterprise information & technology activities.

<blockquote>
''We realize that organizations apply various information & technology methods and approaches such as ITIL, COBIT, ASAP and Oracle AIM, etc. Therefore, we have ensured that all of our published Enterprise Information & Technology Standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Working, Modelling, Implementation and Governance.''
</blockquote>

To ensure full integration with other methods and approaches within an organization, the enterprise information & technology standards have an ontology and semantic concept built in that allows for the meta objects to be reused in the other enterprise standards as well as the industry standards.

This includes applying the various standards used within information & technology:
*'''Management Principles''' - to define the purpose and goals as well as to administer, govern and control the IT initiatives.
*'''Engineering Principles''' - how and where it can or needs to be decomposed and composed together.
*'''Modelling Principles''' - which design concepts can or should be applied.
*'''Architecture Principles''' - which architecture rules apply and which artifacts and templates (e.g. maps, matrices and models) could or should be applied.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture-01.png|frame|center|900px|link=http://{{SERVERNAME}}/images/b/b7/LEAD-Frameworks-Enterprise-Engineering-Enterprise-Modelling-Enterprise-Architecture.pdf|Enterprise Engineering, Enterprise Modelling & Enterprise Architecture]]

Creating the ability to '''"Align, Compare & Unify"''' different enterprise standards together as well as combine them with the industry standards (or vice versa) in combining the relevant aspect e.g. meta objects.

Developing a whole new concept of agile integration and standardization in the following 23 enterprise information & technology disciplines and areas:

{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 60%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''ENTERPRISE INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 40%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
'''LEAD-ES50EIT'''
|-
|[[#|IT Strategy Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50001PG
|-
|[[#|Business Model of IT Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50002BC
|-
|[[#|IT Process Map Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50003BP
|-
|[[#|IT Center of Competency Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50004BC
|-
|[[#|Cloud Computing Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50005CC
|-
|[[#|Cyber Security Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50007CS
|-
|[[#|Knowledge Management Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50008PGIDBC
|-
|[[#|Analytic Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50009PGIDBC
|-
|[[#|Reporting Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50010PGIDBC
|-
|[[#|Application Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50011SAIDBCBP
|-
|[[#|Application Modernization & Optimization Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50012SAIDBCBP
|-
|[[#|ERP Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50013SADIBC
|-
|[[#|Software Testing Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50014SADI
|-
|[[#|Information Management Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50015BCIDSA
|-
|[[#|Data Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50016DISABC
|-
|[[#|Rule Modelling Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50017PGBCSADI
|-
|[[#|Service-Oriented Computing Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50018ES
|-
|[[#|Platform Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50019PLES
|-
|[[#|Infrastructure Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50020IL
|-
|[[#|Social Media Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50021AL
|-
|[[Enterprise_Standards:Blueprinting_Reference_Content|Blueprinting Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50022AL
|-
|[[#|Implementation Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50023AL
|-
|[[#|Cloud Ontology Reference Content]]
|LEAD-ES50024ALL
|-
|}

<blockquote>
''Please note that the Enterprise Information & Technology Standards are only open for the LEADing Practice community members, however, some material has been made publicly available for review purposes.''
</blockquote>

Our community consist of organizations applying our LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards e.g. practitioners, software vendors and academics. Being a community-driven open architecture and open standard access to all assets, templates, tools and artifacts is free for certified practitioners, thereby ensuring that modelling principles are applied correctly.

While it is free to join the community and no cost apply to the use of any community assets, the quality of the participating practitioners must be guaranteed, by being LEAD certified in the specific field of where they work. For organizations interested in applying LEADing Practices, we recommend contacting us and highlighting the objective and key challenges, whereafter a practitioner will be assigned to support you.

If you would like to get access to our extensive database of Enterprise Information & Technology Standards and reference content, please fill [[#|out this form]].

:Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content

2015-09-02T13:30:52Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content}}

'''Description of the Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content'''

The Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content and the Service (Se) Templates provide an overview of the key (business) services of an enterprise and their specific (decomposed) service aspects. The purpose of the Service (Se) Templates is to provide a centralized and official overview of the key (business) services of an enterprise with their specification and their relations as described above.

A service delivers or supports business capabilities, has an explicitly defined interface, and is explicitly governed. Services are defined for both the business layer (purpose and goal (i.e. value), competency, service and process), information systems (application layer including data) as well as for technology (platform and infrastructure layer).

'''Service (Se) Templates & Artifacts'''

The Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content has 3 types of templates and artifacts in terms of both Service (Se) maps, matrices and models that capture the meta objects which are instrumental, and an essential part of the enterprise modelling, enterprise engineering and enterprise architecture. Each of these are based on a specific view, with particular stakeholder concern to enable value identification, creation, and realization.

Fully integrated and standardized service modelling and architecture templates enables the subject matter experts/practitioners to work and model with the service meta objects throughout all the architectural layers (business, application and technology) and this is one of the greatest strengths of the LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards. Not only are the service objects governed by its connection modelling rules, but how and where the templates interlink and share common objects is also defined and standardized.

'''The Service (Se) Map Template'''

The Service (Se) Map shows the key (business) services of the enterprise and their decomposed service aspects. The Service (Se) Map consist of content in the listed format:
*What specification: Service Area
*What specification: Service Group
*What specificaion: Business Service
*What specification: Service Channel
*Where specification: Service Construct (Setup & Delivery)
*Where specification: Service Channel
*Where specification: Service Tier (strategic, tactical and operational)
*What/which specification: Service Type (main, management or support)
*What/which specification: Service Flow (including input/output)
*Who/Whose specification: Service Owner
*Who/Whose specification: Stakeholder Involved
*Who/Whose specification: Manager Involved
*Who/Whose specification: Service/Process/Application Roles Involved

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Table-Service-Map-01.png|frame|center|900px|link=http://{{SERVERNAME}}/images/8/86/LEAD-Frameworks-Table-Service-Map.pdf|Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content - Service Map]]

The purpose of the Service (Se) Map is to identify and decompose a list of all the services within the enterprise. This list helps to understand the breadth of functionality provided by the services. It will also provide a centralized and official overview of the key services in the enterprise including all service-related aspects.

'''The Service (Se) Matrix Template'''

The Service (Se) Matrix provides an overview of the key (business) services of the enterprise and its purpose is to relate these services to other meta objects that share a relationship with the key (business) services of the enterprise. The Service (Se) Matrix consist of content in the listed format:
*Which specification e.g. internal and external forces and drivers
*Why in terms of strategy e.g. strategic business objectives and critical success factors (objectives)
*Whither in terms of goal specification e.g. goals, plans, requirements, etc.
*Which specification e.g. performance indicator tier (strategic, tactical and operational)
*Why in terms of expectations e.g. performance and value expectations.
*Which specification e.g. service measurements, reporting and channels are involved
*Who/whom specification e.g. business roles and resources/actors
*What/which specification e.g. competency type (core competitive, core differentiating or non-core
*Why in terms of reason of behavior e.g. rules and compliance aspects.
*Where specification e.g. business workflow and process flow
*What/which specification e.g. business, information and data objects.
*What/which specification e.g. business process, step or activity
*How specification e.g. events and gateways
*Whom/whose specification e.g. process owner
*What/which specification e.g. application, data service, platform service and infrastructure service

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Table-Service-Matrix-01.png|frame|center|900px|link=http://{{SERVERNAME}}/images/6/66/LEAD-Frameworks-Table-Service-Matrix.pdf|Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content - Service Matrix]]

The Service maps, matrices and models are therefore used in the decomposition and composition work within and throughout the different layers. Each specific Service template shows which objects are within which template, thereby specifying if it is a map, a matrix or a model. It furthermore shows where the object of one template can be reused in another template.

'''Using the Service (Se) Templates & Artifacts'''

Once the key (business) services of the enterprise have been specified, they are then linked to, associated with and connected to the other objects. This association enables the expert/practitioner to tie them to the areas where the key (business) services have a connection and/or influence. A list of meta objects the key (business) services relate to are:
*Driver & Forces (external/internal) (S)
*Strategy (Strategic Business Objective) (P)
*Goal (e.g. business, application, technology) (P)
*Objective (Critical Success Factor, Plan, Forecast, Budget) (P)
*Performance Indicator (+Tier: Strategic, Tactical or Operational) (S)
*Value Expectation (S)
*Performance Expectation (P)
*Reporting (S)
*Resource/Actor (S)
*Business Roles (P)
*Competency Type (Diff, Comp, Non-Core) (S)
*Business Rules (S)
*Business Compliance (S)
*Business Workflow (S)
*Service Construct (setup & delivery) (S)
*Service Area (P)
*Service Group (P)
*Business Service (S)
*Service Type (Main/Mgmt./Support) (S)
*Service Flow (incl. output/input) (S)
*Service Tier (Strategic/Tactical/Operational) (S)
*Object (Business, Information & Data) (S)
*Service Measurements (Level Agreements) (S)
*Service Owner (P)
*Service Roles (P)
*Service Rules (S)
*Service Channel (S)
*Process Step (P)
*Process Activity (P)
*Events (P)
*Gateways (P)
*Process Flow (incl. Input/output) (P)
*Process Roles (P)
*Process Owner (P)
*Application Service (P)
*Application/System Reports (S)
*Application Roles (P)
*Application Compliance (S)
*Data Service (P)
*Platform Service (P)
*Infrastructure Service (P)

'''Roles involved with the Service (Se) Templates and meta objects:'''

{|class="wikitable" style="border: none;width:100%;border:0px; color:white;"
|class="thead" style="border: none;background-color:#1497d5;width: 30%;text-align:left;" |
'''ENTERPRISE MODELLERS'''
|class="thead" style="border: none;background-color:#1497d5;width: 30%;text-align:left;color:white;" |
'''ENTERPRISE ENGINEERS'''
|class="thead" style="border: none;background-color:#1497d5;width: 30%;text-align:left;color:white;" |
'''ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTS'''
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Business Analyst (P)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Value Engineer (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Business Architect (P)
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Value eXpert (P)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Process Engineer (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Value Architect (P)
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Process eXpert (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |
Software Engineer (P)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Enterprise Architect (S)
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Transformation eXpert (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Technology Engineer (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Solution Architect (S)
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Information eXpert (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |

|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Service Architect (P)
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Service eXpert (P)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |

|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Information Architect (S)
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |

|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |

|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;" |Technology Architect (S)
|-
|}

(P) = Primary object/role
(S) = Secondary object/role

'''Stakeholders involved with the Service (Se) Templates and meta objects:'''

*Top Management: CEO/President
*High Management: Chief x (*) Officer/Vice President/Senior Executive/Director/Senior Manager
*Middle Management: Manager/Senior (Team) Leader
*Lower Management: Team/Group Leader
*Operational: User (Senior, Medior, Junior)

(*): Chief Executive Officer, Chief Channel Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer, Chief Risk & Security Officer, Chief HR Office, Chief Marketing & Sales Officer, Chief R&D Officer, Chief Procurement Officer, Chief Strategy Officer, Chief Buss. Dev. Officer, Chief Technology Officer, Chief Environment & Health Officer.

'''The Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content Poster'''

We have put together a poster containing many different Service Models touching many important aspects of key (business) services of an enterprise.

[[File:POSTER-LEAD-Service-Reference-Framework-01.png|frame|center|900px|link=http://{{SERVERNAME}}/images/2/20/POSTER-LEAD-Service-Reference-Framework.pdf|Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content Poster]]

:Strategy Management Reference Content

2015-09-02T12:42:48Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Strategy Management Reference Content}}

=== Description of the Strategy Management Reference Content ===

As described in the definition of the LEAD Glossary, a strategy is defined, created and orchestrated based on many different factors – usually on behalf of factors that are internal yet also factors that are external. Even so, a strategy orientates around and within different types of contexts. For the purpose of the Strategy (S) Map and Strategy (S) Matrix, we will consider strategy to be the intentional plan, containing specific statements of goals and strategic directions/actions to gain (or being prepared to gain) a position of advantage over adversaries or to best exploit emerging possibilities.

=== Strategy (S) Templates & Artifacts ===

The Strategy Reference Content has 3 types of artifacts in terms of both strategy maps, matrices and models that capture the meta objects which are instrumental, and an essential part of the enterprise modelling, enterprise engineering and enterprise architecture. Each of these are based on a specific view, with particular stakeholder concern to enable value identification, creation, and realization in achieving the linked Value, Performance, Cost or Revenue Driver identified.

Fully integrated and standardized application modelling and architecture templates enables the subject matter experts/practitioners to work and model with the strategy meta objects throughout all the architectural layers (business, application and technology) and this is one of the greatest strengths of the LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards. Not only are the strategy objects governed by its connection modelling rules, but how and where the templates interlink and share common objects is also defined and standardized.

=== The Strategy (S) Map Template ===

The Strategy (S) Map provides an overview of the key strategies of the organization and their main aspects. The following aspects are described per strategy by default:
* ''' What ''' (in terms of context specification) = Strategic Business Objectives.
* ''' Where ''' (in terms of location specification) = Enterprise Area, Business Area/Group, etc.
* ''' How ''' (in terms of how-to-do-it specification) = Balanced Scorecard areas such as (for example) Customers, Finance, Operations (Processes) & Learning.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Table-Strategy-Map.pdf|LEAD Frameworks Table Strategy Map]]

=== The Strategy (S) Matrix Template ===

The Strategy (S) Matrix provides an overview of the key strategies of the organization and their main relationships with other Objects:
* ''' Why ''' (in terms of reason and/or motivation for change specification) = Forces & Drivers.
* ''' Who ''' (in terms of business, service and/or process area is responsible for the results) = Owner.
* ''' Whither ''' (in terms of goal specification) = Critical Success Factors, Planning, Forecasting, Budgetting.
* ''' Who/whom ''' (in terms of who is concerned with and/or responsible for the delivery of the results) = Stakeholders and resources involved.
* ''' What/which ''' (in terms of what and/or which type of object/relation delivers the results) = Performance Indicator.
* ''' Which ''' (in terms of what is to be expected from the output) = Value expectations.
* ''' Who/whom ''' (in terms of who is responsible for the reporting delivery) = Reporting owner and/or responsibility partaker.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Table-Strategy-Matrix.pdf|LEAD Frameworks Table Strategy Matrix]]

The strategy maps, matrices and models are therefore used in the decomposition and composition work within and throughout the different layers. Each specific strategy template shows which objects are within which template, thereby specifying if it is a map, a matrix or a model. It furthermore shows where the object of one template can be reused in another template.

The Strategy (S) Model and the identified Strategic Business Objectives of a company (and thereby the strategy itself) can – for example in the following Finance Strategy Model - be categorized and connected as shown in the following picture:
*Improve Operational Excellence (SBO)
*Strengthen Internal Controls (SBO)
*Improve Compliance & Governance (SBO)
*Optimize Cost Control (SBO)
*Strengthen Cash Flow Management (SBO)

The above 5 Strategic Business Objectives are then directly connected to, at least, one or more Critical Success Factors (objectives) that has also been identified and aligned to the strategy of the example Finance Strategy Model. Each Critical Success Factor has then, in turn, been associated with and related to several other important factors of the enterprise, such as:
*Reporting requirements and functionality
*Business competency groups
*Business policies and legislative requirements
*Mission and value statements of the enterprise

[[File:LEAD-Enterprise-Strategy-Reference-Content-Strategy-Model-Finance.pdf|LEAD Enterprise Strategy Reference Content Strategy Model Finance]]

=== Using the Strategy (S) Templates & Artifacts ===

Once the Strategic Business Objectives have been specified, they are then linked to, associated with and connected to the other objects. This association enables the expert/practitioner to tie them to the areas where the Strategic Business Objectives have a connection and/or influence. A list of meta objects the Strategic Business Objectives relate to are:
*Forces & Drivers (external/internal) (S)
*Vision & Mission (S)
*Goal (business, application, technology) (P)
*Objective (Critical Success Factor, Plan, Forecast, Budget) (P)
*Performance Indicator (+Tier: Strategic, Tactical or Operational) (S)
*Value Expectation (S)
*Reporting (S)
*Business Area (S)
*Business Group (S)
*Business Owner (S)
*Service Area (S)
*Service Group (S)
*Service Owner (S)
*Process Area (categorization) (S)
*Process Group (categorization) (S)
*Process Owner (S)
*Application/System Owner (S)
*Data Owner (S)
*Platform Owner (S)
*Infrastructure Owner (S)

'''Roles involved with the Strategy templates and meta objects:'''
{|class="wikitable" style="border: none;width:100%;border:0px; color:white;"
|class="thead" style="border: none;background-color:#1497d5;width: 30%;text-align:left;" |
'''ENTERPRISE MODELLERS'''
|class="thead" style="border: none;background-color:#1497d5;width: 30%;text-align:left;color:white;" |
'''ENTERPRISE ENGINEERS'''
|class="thead" style="border: none;background-color:#1497d5;width: 30%;text-align:left;color:white;" |
'''ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTS'''
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Business Analyst (P)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Value Engineer (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Business Architect (P)
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Value eXpert (P)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Change Engineer (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Value Architect (P)
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Transformation eXpert (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Enterprise Architect (S)
|-
|}

(P) = Primary object/role
(S) = Secondary object/role

==== Stakeholders involved with the Strategy templates and meta objects: ====

*Top Management: CEO/President
*High Management: Chief x (*) Officer/Vice President/Senior Executive/Director/Senior Manager
*Middle Management: Manager/Senior (Team) Leader
*Lower Management: Team/Group Leader
*Operational: User (Senior, Medior, Junior)

(*): Chief Executive Officer, Chief Channel Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer, Chief Risk & Security Officer, Chief HR Office, Chief Marketing & Sales Officer, Chief R&D Officer, Chief Procurement Officer, Chief Strategy Officer, Chief Buss. Dev. Officer, Chief Technology Officer, Chief Environment & Health Officer.

=== The Strategy Roadmap ===

To help moving through the active phases and to partake a step-by-step approach, a Strategy Roadmap is a very powerful tool meant to guide and aid everyone involved to achieve their strategy goals. The Strategy Roadmap is a great tool for creating a corporate strategy, or even just for single business areas and/or units. Once all of the identified, defined and associated object relationships and values have been categorized, they will become an invaluable tool for top management as well as stakeholders and other organizational roles involved to organize and orchestrate the identification, creation and realization of value across both the business, application and technology layers alike.

As depicted in the attached Strategy Roadmap Model below, an example of a step-by-step approach for creating a strategy can look like this:
 What the company SHOULD do – Strategy Identification 
 
(Focus on Business Models as well as Core Competitive & Core Differentiating Competencies)

*Analyze Existing Strategy
*Identify Internal & External Drivers (Competitive Forces)
*Understand Business Model Drivers
*Outline Strategic Business Objectives (SBO’s)
*Identify Performance & Value Opportunities

 What the company WANT to do – Strategy Planning 
 
(Focus on Operational Business Models as well as Performance & Value)

*Analyze CAN, WANT and SHOULD do scenarios
*Analyze & Benchmark Strategies
*Identify Pain Chain & Goal Chain
*Identify Critical Success Factors
*Define Innovation & Transformation Need

What the company CAN do – Strategy Creation
 
(Focus on Enterprise Value Architecture)

*Create Strategy Map
*Understand/Create Scorecards
*Create Value Map
*Create Performance Measurements
*Prioritize Innovation & Transformation Initiatives

[[File:LEAD-Enterprise-Strategy-Reference-Content-Strategy-Roadmap.pdf|LEAD Enterprise Strategy Reference Content Strategy Roadmap]]

:Strategy Management Reference Content

2015-09-02T12:41:09Z

90.185.212.37:

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Strategy Management Reference Content}}

=== Description of the Strategy Management Reference Content ===

As described in the definition of the LEAD Glossary, a strategy is defined, created and orchestrated based on many different factors – usually on behalf of factors that are internal yet also factors that are external. Even so, a strategy orientates around and within different types of contexts. For the purpose of the Strategy (S) Map and Strategy (S) Matrix, we will consider strategy to be the intentional plan, containing specific statements of goals and strategic directions/actions to gain (or being prepared to gain) a position of advantage over adversaries or to best exploit emerging possibilities.

 

=== Strategy (S) Templates & Artifacts ===

The Strategy Reference Content has 3 types of artifacts in terms of both strategy maps, matrices and models that capture the meta objects which are instrumental, and an essential part of the enterprise modelling, enterprise engineering and enterprise architecture. Each of these are based on a specific view, with particular stakeholder concern to enable value identification, creation, and realization in achieving the linked Value, Performance, Cost or Revenue Driver identified.

 

Fully integrated and standardized application modelling and architecture templates enables the subject matter experts/practitioners to work and model with the strategy meta objects throughout all the architectural layers (business, application and technology) and this is one of the greatest strengths of the LEADing Practice Enterprise Standards. Not only are the strategy objects governed by its connection modelling rules, but how and where the templates interlink and share common objects is also defined and standardized.

=== The Strategy (S) Map Template ===

The Strategy (S) Map provides an overview of the key strategies of the organization and their main aspects. The following aspects are described per strategy by default:

* ''' What ''' (in terms of context specification) = Strategic Business Objectives.
* ''' Where ''' (in terms of location specification) = Enterprise Area, Business Area/Group, etc.
* ''' How ''' (in terms of how-to-do-it specification) = Balanced Scorecard areas such as (for example) Customers, Finance, Operations (Processes) & Learning.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Table-Strategy-Map.pdf|LEAD Frameworks Table Strategy Map]]

=== The Strategy (S) Matrix Template ===

The Strategy (S) Matrix provides an overview of the key strategies of the organization and their main relationships with other Objects:

* ''' Why ''' (in terms of reason and/or motivation for change specification) = Forces & Drivers.
* ''' Who ''' (in terms of business, service and/or process area is responsible for the results) = Owner.
* ''' Whither ''' (in terms of goal specification) = Critical Success Factors, Planning, Forecasting, Budgetting.
* ''' Who/whom ''' (in terms of who is concerned with and/or responsible for the delivery of the results) = Stakeholders and resources involved.
* ''' What/which ''' (in terms of what and/or which type of object/relation delivers the results) = Performance Indicator.
* ''' Which ''' (in terms of what is to be expected from the output) = Value expectations.
* ''' Who/whom ''' (in terms of who is responsible for the reporting delivery) = Reporting owner and/or responsibility partaker.

[[File:LEAD-Frameworks-Table-Strategy-Matrix.pdf|LEAD Frameworks Table Strategy Matrix]]

The strategy maps, matrices and models are therefore used in the decomposition and composition work within and throughout the different layers. Each specific strategy template shows which objects are within which template, thereby specifying if it is a map, a matrix or a model. It furthermore shows where the object of one template can be reused in another template.

 

The Strategy (S) Model and the identified Strategic Business Objectives of a company (and thereby the strategy itself) can – for example in the following Finance Strategy Model - be categorized and connected as shown in the following picture:

 

*Improve Operational Excellence (SBO)
*Strengthen Internal Controls (SBO)
*Improve Compliance & Governance (SBO)
*Optimize Cost Control (SBO)
*Strengthen Cash Flow Management (SBO)

The above 5 Strategic Business Objectives are then directly connected to, at least, one or more Critical Success Factors (objectives) that has also been identified and aligned to the strategy of the example Finance Strategy Model. Each Critical Success Factor has then, in turn, been associated with and related to several other important factors of the enterprise, such as:

 

*Reporting requirements and functionality
*Business competency groups
*Business policies and legislative requirements
*Mission and value statements of the enterprise

[[File:LEAD-Enterprise-Strategy-Reference-Content-Strategy-Model-Finance.pdf|LEAD Enterprise Strategy Reference Content Strategy Model Finance]]

=== Using the Strategy (S) Templates & Artifacts ===

Once the Strategic Business Objectives have been specified, they are then linked to, associated with and connected to the other objects. This association enables the expert/practitioner to tie them to the areas where the Strategic Business Objectives have a connection and/or influence. A list of meta objects the Strategic Business Objectives relate to are:

 

*Forces & Drivers (external/internal) (S)
*Vision & Mission (S)
*Goal (business, application, technology) (P)
*Objective (Critical Success Factor, Plan, Forecast, Budget) (P)
*Performance Indicator (+Tier: Strategic, Tactical or Operational) (S)
*Value Expectation (S)
*Reporting (S)
*Business Area (S)
*Business Group (S)
*Business Owner (S)
*Service Area (S)
*Service Group (S)
*Service Owner (S)
*Process Area (categorization) (S)
*Process Group (categorization) (S)
*Process Owner (S)
*Application/System Owner (S)
*Data Owner (S)
*Platform Owner (S)
*Infrastructure Owner (S)

'''Roles involved with the Strategy templates and meta objects:'''
{|class="wikitable" style="border: none;width:100%;border:0px; color:white;"
|class="thead" style="border: none;background-color:#1497d5;width: 30%;text-align:left;" |
'''ENTERPRISE MODELLERS'''
|class="thead" style="border: none;background-color:#1497d5;width: 30%;text-align:left;color:white;" |
'''ENTERPRISE ENGINEERS'''
|class="thead" style="border: none;background-color:#1497d5;width: 30%;text-align:left;color:white;" |
'''ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTS'''
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Business Analyst (P)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Value Engineer (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Business Architect (P)
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Value eXpert (P)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Change Engineer (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Value Architect (P)
|-
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Transformation eXpert (S)
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|
|style="border: none;background-color:#ebecec;color:black;"|Enterprise Architect (S)
|-
|}

(P) = Primary object/role
(S) = Secondary object/role

 

==== Stakeholders involved with the Strategy templates and meta objects: ====

*Top Management: CEO/President
*High Management: Chief x (*) Officer/Vice President/Senior Executive/Director/Senior Manager
*Middle Management: Manager/Senior (Team) Leader
*Lower Management: Team/Group Leader
*Operational: User (Senior, Medior, Junior)

(*): Chief Executive Officer, Chief Channel Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer, Chief Risk & Security Officer, Chief HR Office, Chief Marketing & Sales Officer, Chief R&D Officer, Chief Procurement Officer, Chief Strategy Officer, Chief Buss. Dev. Officer, Chief Technology Officer, Chief Environment & Health Officer.

 

=== The Strategy Roadmap ===

To help moving through the active phases and to partake a step-by-step approach, a Strategy Roadmap is a very powerful tool meant to guide and aid everyone involved to achieve their strategy goals. The Strategy Roadmap is a great tool for creating a corporate strategy, or even just for single business areas and/or units. Once all of the identified, defined and associated object relationships and values have been categorized, they will become an invaluable tool for top management as well as stakeholders and other organizational roles involved to organize and orchestrate the identification, creation and realization of value across both the business, application and technology layers alike.

 

As depicted in the attached Strategy Roadmap Model below, an example of a step-by-step approach for creating a strategy can look like this:

 

 What the company SHOULD do – Strategy Identification 
 
(Focus on Business Models as well as Core Competitive & Core Differentiating Competencies)

*Analyze Existing Strategy
*Identify Internal & External Drivers (Competitive Forces)
*Understand Business Model Drivers
*Outline Strategic Business Objectives (SBO’s)
*Identify Performance & Value Opportunities

 What the company WANT to do – Strategy Planning 
 
(Focus on Operational Business Models as well as Performance & Value)

*Analyze CAN, WANT and SHOULD do scenarios
*Analyze & Benchmark Strategies
*Identify Pain Chain & Goal Chain
*Identify Critical Success Factors
*Define Innovation & Transformation Need

What the company CAN do – Strategy Creation
 
(Focus on Enterprise Value Architecture)

*Create Strategy Map
*Understand/Create Scorecards
*Create Value Map
*Create Performance Measurements
*Prioritize Innovation & Transformation Initiatives

[[File:LEAD-Enterprise-Strategy-Reference-Content-Strategy-Roadmap.pdf|LEAD Enterprise Strategy Reference Content Strategy Roadmap]]

:Supply Chain & Logistics Management Reference Content

2015-09-02T12:38:57Z

90.185.212.37:

[[Category:Enterprise Management Standards]]
=== Supply Chain & Logistics Management Reference Content ===
The LEADing Practice Supply Chain & Logistics Reference Content standards are the result of international industry expert and academic consensus and agreement. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused/replicated and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its products/services or activities.
 
The Supply Chain & Logistics standards have been developed in the following ways:

 
# Research and analyze Supply Chain & Logistics Best Practice & LEADing Practices.
# Identify common and repeatable patterns (the basis of our standards).
# Develop the Supply Chain & Logistics standards that increase the level of re-usability and replication.
# Build Supply Chain & Logistics accelerators within the standards, enabling to adopt and reproduce the Best & LEADing Practices
 
We realize that organizations apply various standards, therefore we have ensured that all our Supply Chain & Logistics standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Way of Working, Way of Modelling, Way of Implementing and Way of Governing. Having integrated guiding principles and detailed frameworks, methods, approaches, semantic relations, meta models (object groups, meta objects), architecture rules, templates (maps, matrices and models) and accelerators (content). All together describing the set of procedures an organization needs to follow in order to replicate the ability to identify, create and realize value in the specified area/subject.
 
Below are some examples of the LEADing Practice Supply Chain & Logistics Reference Content standards:
 
{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%"; |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;" |
'''Standard/Template'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 30%;text-align:left;" |
'''Reference Content'''
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Business-Competencies-Supply-Chain.pdf|Supply Chain & Logistics Competency Map]]
|Example attached
|-
|[[Media:LEAD-Business-Model-Level-2-Logistics-Service-Provider.png|LEAD Business Model Level 2 Logistics Service Provider]]
|Example attached
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Supply-Chain-Business-Competency-Assessment.pdf|Supply Chain & Logistics Business Model Assessment]]
|Example attached
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Supply-Chain-Strategy-Matrix.pdf|Supply Chain & Logistics Strategy Matrix]]
|Example attached
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Supply-Chain-Value-Model.pdf|Supply Chain & Logistics Value Map]]
|Example attached
|-
|Major Supply Chain & Logistics Performance Drivers
| 
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Supply-Chain-Reporting-Measurements.pdf|Key Performance Indicators of Supply Chain & Logistics (KPIs)]]
|Example attached
|-
|[[Media:LEAD-Measurement-Reference-Content-SAP-SCM-Raw-Material-Inventory-Turnover-01.png|SAP Supply Chain – Raw Material KPI Tree & Data Model]]
|Example attached
|-
|Supply Chain & Logistics Information Flow Architecture
| 
|-
|Supply Chain & Logistics SBOs/CSFs/KPIs & Processes
| 
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Value-based-Design-for-Supply-Chain.pdf|LEADing Practice Value-based Design for Supply Chain]]
|Example attached
|-
|Supply Chain & Logistics Maturity Model
| 
|-
|[[Media:Example-of-LEADing-Practice-Supply-Chain-Business-Architecture.pdf|Supply Chain & Logistics Business Architecture]]
|Example attached
|-

|}

:Supply Chain & Logistics Management Reference Content

2015-09-02T12:38:24Z

90.185.212.37:

[[Category:Enterprise Management Standards]]
=== Supply Chain & Logistics Management Reference Content ===
The LEADing Practice Supply Chain & Logistics Reference Content standards are the result of international industry expert and academic consensus and agreement. The standards are both agnostic and vendor neutral and are built on repeatable patterns that can be reused/replicated and thereby implemented by any organization, both large and small, regardless of its products/services or activities.
 
The Supply Chain & Logistics standards have been developed in the following ways:

 
# Research and analyze Supply Chain & Logistics Best Practice & LEADing Practices.
# Identify common and repeatable patterns (the basis of our standards).
# Develop the Supply Chain & Logistics standards that increase the level of re-usability and replication.
# Build Supply Chain & Logistics accelerators within the standards, enabling to adopt and reproduce the Best & LEADing Practices
 
We realize that organizations apply various standards, therefore we have ensured that all our Supply Chain & Logistics standards have a structured Way of Thinking, Way of Working, Way of Modelling, Way of Implementing and Way of Governing. Having integrated guiding principles and detailed frameworks, methods, approaches, semantic relations, meta models (object groups, meta objects), architecture rules, templates (maps, matrices and models) and accelerators (content). All together describing the set of procedures an organization needs to follow in order to replicate the ability to identify, create and realize value in the specified area/subject.
 
Below are some examples of the LEADing Practice Supply Chain & Logistics Reference Content standards:
 
{|class="wikitable" style="width:100%"; |
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;" |
'''Standard/Template'''
|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 30%;text-align:left;" |
'''Reference Content'''
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Business-Competencies-Supply-Chain.pdf|Supply Chain & Logistics Competency Map]]
|Example attached
|-
|[[Media:LEAD-Business-Model-Level-2-Logistics-Service-Provider.png|LEAD Business Model Level 2 Logistics Service Provider]]
|Example attached
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Supply-Chain-Business-Competency-Assessment.pdf|Supply Chain & Logistics Business Model Assessment]]
|Example attached
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Supply-Chain-Strategy-Matrix.pdf|Supply Chain & Logistics Strategy Matrix]]
|Example attached
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Supply-Chain-Value-Model.pdf|Supply Chain & Logistics Value Map]]
|Example attached
|-
|Major Supply Chain & Logistics Performance Drivers
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Supply-Chain-Reporting-Measurements.pdf|Key Performance Indicators of Supply Chain & Logistics (KPIs)]]
|Example attached
|-
|[[Media:LEAD-Measurement-Reference-Content-SAP-SCM-Raw-Material-Inventory-Turnover-01.png|
SAP Supply Chain – Raw Material KPI Tree & Data Model]]
|Example attached
|-
|Supply Chain & Logistics Information Flow Architecture
| 
|-
|Supply Chain & Logistics SBOs/CSFs/KPIs & Processes
| 
|-
|[[Media:LEADing-Practice-Value-based-Design-for-Supply-Chain.pdf|LEADing Practice Value-based Design for Supply Chain]]
|Example attached
|-
|Supply Chain & Logistics Maturity Model
| 
|-
|[[Media:Example-of-LEADing-Practice-Supply-Chain-Business-Architecture.pdf|Supply Chain & Logistics Business Architecture]]
|Example attached
|-

|}

Main page

2015-09-02T09:01:59Z

90.185.212.37: Blanked the page

Main

2015-09-02T09:01:38Z

90.185.212.37: Blanked the page